User talk:Raisinman

This user is a sock puppet of Kdbuffalo as established by WP:RCU, and has been blocked indefinitely.

See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

Edit summaries

Raisinman -- when you erased your talk page and the warning placed there (which is really considered bad form at Wikipedia), your edit summary (referring to User:Alienus read. "removed nonsense of atheist loser with username alienus". Please review WP:CIV and WP:NPA, which you seem to have violated. It is against policy to insult or degrade any user because of his/her religious beliefs, whether Christian, Jewish, atheist, etc. Also, referring to the editor as a "loser" is completely uncalled for. Please review these policies. Additionally, if you are not a sockpuppet, let us know. KHM03 11:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?

Are you the editor formerly known as User:Kdbuffalo? KHM03 12:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this regarding blanking your talk page. You'll get a lot further if you stop hostilities and talk to your co-editors on Wikipedia. KHM03 22:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raisinman

Per Wikipedia policy on ownership of articles, you DO NOT OWN your talk page. The text here that is not typed by you is the legal property of the contributing editor, licensed to Wikipedia: you are interfering with the contributors' copyrighted text.
Per WP:WORLD, the world does not revolve around you. Get over it.
Per WP:TIAC, there is a cabal. That cabal will take care of this encyclopedia ... and that means maintaining and supporting the Wikipedia policies, including keeping track of suspected and verified sockpuppets. If that includes you, then the cabal will defeat you. If that does not include you, then you're fine.

If you are not a sockpuppet and can work within Wikipedia policies, great! Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you enjoy yourself. If you are a sckpuppet, or if you cannot abide by the policies, then you have three choices:

Resolve to abide by the policies even if you don't like them;
Leave;
Get defeated--again, and again, and again--as you attempt (and fail) to disrupt the project.

That's the size of it. Editors will abide by the rules--either willingly, or by force. The choice is yours.

Justin Eiler 22:58, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if you are a sockpuppet, as long as you don't use multiple identities to evade WP rules (such as WP:3RR). We've seen that recently on some Jesus/Christianity related articles. KHM03 00:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here, as a "checkuser" has been requested. KHM03 23:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sock warnings

Blanking a sock warning can be considered vandalism, and can result in banning. Justin Eiler 04:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]