User talk:Raj vin

Welcome!

Hello, Raj vin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 09:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely

to be deleted - due to sufficient abiding by WP:V, WP:N and so on - but note the general message about writing about yourself! JarrahTree 09:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raj vin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Raj vin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Vinayak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Vinayak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bill Shorten has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bill Shorten was changed by Raj vin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852192 on 2018-05-16T02:11:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raj vin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There has to be some sort of misunderstanding as my account has been blocked. I haven't made a single contribution on Wikipedia since May this year. Raj vin (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK using your other account, Leostamp (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raj vin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No harm was caused. I have only made positive contribtuions so far. Raj vin (talk) 12:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please explain why you feel that you need eighteen accounts. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raj vin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know if you are joking Anthony or being serious. Which "18" accounts that you accused me of I owned? The thing is you are blocking me for no reason at all i haven't made any harmful edits so far and want to continue to make positive changes on Wikipedia. Raj vin (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sockpuppetry and you have not addressed that issue in this unblock request. Yes, WP:Checkuser tool identified large number of connected accounts making disruptive edits. Please, explain that. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raj vin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why would I address an issue that I know nothing about, basically right now what I see it as is it's your word over mine and end of story. I haven't made any disruptive edits as this can be a shared IP address used by many others. Raj vin (talk) 08:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A checkuser has confirmed your connection to the other accounts. I am revoking your access to edit this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.