User talk:Ramesh012

Ramesh012, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ramesh012! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanku Ramesh012 (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello Ramesh012. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to CarryMinati, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ramesh012. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ramesh012|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 08:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i am not paid for this i just want to improve the article Ramesh012 (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding promotional text and spammy sources, despite having been told that that text and those sources were inappropriate. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. Furthermore, you are making changes that have no source – how do you know which school he went to? I can't see that any of the sources mentions that. --bonadea contributions talk 08:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at CarryMinati, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 08:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information on Wikipedia how this is promotion? Ramesh012 (talk) 08:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The number of subscribers a YouTube channel has at a particular time is not encyclopedic information unless it has been discussed by independent sources. No such sources have been presented. Any claim of being "the first" needs very strong secondary sourcing, not interviews with the person himself. There is no hurry – you seem to find it important to add this claim very quickly, but it is perferctly fine to allow some months to pass to see if it turns out to be information that has lasting importance. Right now, it has no importance at all except to the person himself. --bonadea contributions talk 09:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're right thanks for this information Ramesh012 (talk) 09:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at CarryMinati, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 09:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Mayday (2022 film). bonadea contributions talk 05:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ramesh012 (talk) 03:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ramesh012 (talk) 04:43, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yalgaar (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yalgaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yalgaar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 06:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Yalgaar

Someone please help me to improve my Draft I am new here. Ramesh012 (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft : Yalgaar

Hi Bonadea, The draft Yalgaar is in my watchlist and I saw you have declined the draft stating the subject is not notable. Here I fail to understand why the subject is not notable if we have a good amount of coverage from sources like The Indian Express, Republic world, The Economic Times and many more Thankyou. Ramesh012 (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yalgaar (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at CarryMinati. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

This draft does not indicate that the song satisfies any of the musical notability criteria. The statement is made that it ranks number 6, but it is not clear whether that is on any of the recognized charts. The submitter is strongly advised to request advice from one of the musical projects, such as WikiProject Songs, as to what charts are recognized and how to verify notability.

After removing all of the promotional material, there is not much left in this stub.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yalgaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yalgaar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yalgaar (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yalgaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yalgaar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanmay Bhat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaming. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you indefinitely for promoting/WP:UPE CarryMinati, as well as being a possible sock or meat puppet of User:U.G sam and/or User:Krish121. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 could this 8day old user Celmonbos be a new sock? They both use same userboxes and editing mostly in Carryminati topicRatnahastin(t.c) 02:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin: Yes, blocked, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this user Menu maharaj using same userbox and editing Draft:Yalgaar (song) as with previous sockRatnahastin(t.c) 14:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]