User talk:Raphinou

Welcome!

Hello, Raphinou, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Austronesian alignment you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking over chapter 7 of Blust's ebook, in which he discusses Austronesian alignment. What material are you referring to? Thanks. Raphinou (talk) 22:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just looked over the report on the iThenticate link. The report identifies the copied material as the samples from the Tondano language that I had included in the Wikipedia article. The bot report indicates that these samples are from Blust's ebook. However, this is incorrect. I took these samples from Sneddon 1970 (Sneddon, J.N. 1970. "The languages of Minahasa, North Celebes". Oceanic Linguistics 9:11-36.), which is the same journal article from which Blust obtained the same Tondano samples that he had included in his ebook. In the Wikipedia article, I refer to Sneddon 1970 in the endnotes, and provide the full citation in the references. Given that I had gone to the primary source (i.e., Sneddon 1970) of the Tondano samples, I did not bother citing Blust's ebook.

So, proper attribution had originally been made.

Kindly remove the revision that you had added to the reference section since it is incorrect and it makes it seem as if I had done something inappropriate, when in fact, I had not. Thanks. Raphinou (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've done that but the Sneddon article does not appear to be released under a compatible license, and the material you took from there appears to have been copied unaltered, not "adapted". That's a copyright violation. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am following the customary and usual practice of academic research in the field of linguistics. The reproduction of non-creative works, such as linguistic data, in scholarly journals/books constitute copyright violations? Please clarify/confirm.

The adaptation is in the glosses (i.e., the morpheme-by-morpheme translations underneath each of the Tondano words in the sentence).Raphinou (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions: Different examples could be chosen and translated. Alternatively, make it clearer that this is a quotation. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified the endnotes to be more explicit.Raphinou (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Raphinou. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Symmetrical voice

Hi. With this edit, you deleted the 'Studies' section, but your edit-summary only said you were replacing the term. I'm wondering if the deletion might've been a mistake. — kwami (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm restoring on the assumption it was a typo. If there's something wrong with that section, pls summarize in the edit summary. — kwami (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]