User talk:RaviVery

August 2017

Please read previous edit summaries before making changes to the Urdu article. Your edits show that you are not familiar with the subject or the linked topics, so you are advised to do some more background reading or use the talk page before getting into an edit war--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 07:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I know more about Urdu than you. So calm your tits. RaviVery (talk) 23:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@RegentsPark: can this sock of User:DawedalRaqqa be blocked. This is his 4th sock I found in the last week. (2600:1001:B016:7DE7:D5BF:FFE1:EC97:E998 (talk) 01:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC))

@@RegentsPark: Hmmm. This IP hopper looks very suspicious.RaviVery (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

They say they found 4 socks, but their edit history doesn't say so... hmmmm. Please look if you do with a grain of salt. RaviVery (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) RaviVery (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

This IP hopper might be connected to User:2600:1001:B025:3D25:1599:A07E:22D4:25E7 and User:2600:1001:B016:7DE7:84BD:2F4F:87B3:2FC0 and User:Barthateslisa and some other IP hoppers. RaviVery (talk) 02:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

And perhaps User:2600:1001:B00F:C83A:290A:7305:C7BA:C4A and User:2600:1001:B00F:C83A:F571:B46C:2494:E2 as well... this IP hopper has very suspicious history. Look into it. RaviVery (talk) 02:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC) RaviVery (talk) 02:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@PAKHIGHWAY: this is a very serious Sock investigation. Please add in what you know about these IP sock vandal puppets. RaviVery (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC) RaviVery (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Pleas forgive me as I have forgot to put curvy brackets {} to link the IP hopping vandals. Can you copy and paste the User: my dear admins? RaviVery (talk) 02:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

I'll be justifying all my edits in a new thread in my Talk page. If you admins would like.RaviVery (talk) 03:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Admins, please take a look at all my messages. (yes I know they're a lot!) RaviVery (talk) 03:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Justifying my threads

If you haven't read my "August 2017 talk page" please do so. RaviVery (talk) 03:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Oops looks like I've made an typo... The title IS ACTUALLY Justifying my Edits RaviVery (talk) 03:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Just to be clear. I will justify all my EDITS on this talk page. RaviVery (talk) 03:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Please be assured that this may take up to a few days as I am very busy. RaviVery (talk) 03:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Okay let's start: RaviVery (talk) 03:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Soanian should include Soan River, Pakistan... As the archaeological site is named after this river. RaviVery (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Gujarati language is PRIMARILY spoken in India, not Pakistan. There is about 50 million Gujarati speakers in India.. on the other hand there is about 2 million (and dwindling) speakers of it in Pakistan. Note that Gujarati speakers are native to the Gujarat region which is in India. RaviVery (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Urdu is a slightly Arabised in addition to Persianised language. I don't need to cite this one. As there are many sources of this and this is basic knowledge. There is no doubt that this language has Islamic influence. RaviVery (talk) 03:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Riwat is an archeological site/set that is named after Rawat, Murree village which is in Pakistan. It is also closely related to the historical Rawat Fort in the same area and same location. This concludes that these two worthy enough to be included in the See Also of the Riwat article. RaviVery (talk) 03:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

There is NO proper reliable source that proves that the Caste System exists in Pakistan. Any unsourced info should be deleted, taking account there is practically NO evidence on the internet that proves Castes are highly regarded or extensively used in Pakistan. Highly unaccurate. RaviVery (talk) 03:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

I can do more justifications if Admins want. I just want to make sure I am not wasting my time. RaviVery (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

These edits were reverted by the IP hopping vandal. Most of my edits are 100% accurate, I don't see why I am getting scolded for making these edits. Whilst the IP hopper is getting away by reversing my accurate edits to suit his POV and ego. (He/she is the vandal with NO proof or evidence to backup their claims), not me. RaviVery (talk) 03:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Please remember that this person is most likely up to more vandalism under different IP addresses and accounts. This person has NO basis to what's wrong with my edits. They are just a harasser. RaviVery (talk) 03:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Whoever gets banned. I just want the admins to keep all my talk pages and Do Not Delete Them PLEASE. RaviVery (talk) 03:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Non-admin question

Can you explain your edits where you harassed other editors? It is generally not accepted WP behavior to mock and taunt other editors on the basis of their edits. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Harassing.. hmm. Why they are they repeatedly reverting my LEGIT edits in the first place? They either are super duper annoying or just little dirty vandalists. I only harassed 4 times. If you consider what they did to me, you'll agree that's it's justifiable. Some are just bluntly reverting my edits without using Talk. In one case, I called someone a schizophrenic because they wouldn't use proper Wiki etiquette by using talk but they kept reverting my edits—EVEN when I gave them substantial proof to my edits. If they followed the proper rules, I wouldn't have harrased them... Note that I only harassed 4 times in my whole Wiki edit history. Understand? RaviVery (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Do not post any new threads

I have stopped editing. So posting new threads of me vandalizing is absurd and irreverent. I am not doing any editing as of right now. And yes, I can justify all of my edits. Okay? RaviVery (talk) 21:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)