User talk:Red Echidna

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Red Echidna. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! bodnotbod (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article style

Hello, Red Echidna

Just wanted to drop a quick note about Wikipedia:Manual of Style: In Wikipedia, optional styles must be uniformly used throughout an article, meaning that, for instance, either all list sentences in a given article must have oxford comma or none should. Another more important point is stability: An editor should never convert between optional styles; e.g., one should not insert 50 oxford commas into an article that has no oxford commas or remove all oxford commas from an article. In fact, ArbCom does not tolerate such edits and regards them obsessive and disruptive.

Please stick to these two rules. Thanks in advance.

Fleet Command (talk) 00:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me tell a piece of interesting fact: All of those who convert between optional styles (I repeat, all) think that their change is out of necessity! And all those who oppose them also think about necessity! While there are people in this world that think the same as you explained, there are also people in this world that do not see the sentence the way you saw it. Instead when they read the sentence, they think "Symantec, Kaspersky, McAfee and who else?" because when they see comma, they expect at least two more items, not one. When they don't find it, they are briefly confused. Both groups are bound by their habits.

Wikipedia Manual of Style however, acknowledges this issue and thinks both styles of writing deserve equal respect. Hence, the law that I explained to you has come into effect: Uniformity and stability.

Fleet Command (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Editing Imperial Wars noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Editing world wars/imperial wars regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on editing world wars. Thank you.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Red Echidna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Red Echidna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 12:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Is this an automation? What does this mean exactly? I have already tried to discuss any questions or issues that may be, but I have received no response or very roundabout responses. The lack of appropriate action and lack of neutral third-parties reviewing this as a panel is very concerning. Only one person made a decision. Additionally, I have tried to reason with the article vandal, but he has repeatedly demeaned me, made personal insults, and mocked my statements. So, that made any sort of compromise or solution impossible. Red Echidna (talk) 20:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's an alert that discretionary sanctions apply to any edits about living persons. In other words, we have rules on Wikipedia, but even more rules when it comes to living persons, and administrators have additional options to enforce those rules. Like admins can block editors from a page—or from editing at all—if they keep being disruptive.

For example, by edit warring to describe a relationship as "polygamous" when the source doesn't actually say that. I strongly suggest you stop before someone asks that you be blocked. Woodroar (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]