User talk:Renegadegill
Welcome
[edit]
|
Apology
[edit]Sorry about reverting your image. You fixed it just before I started restoring the other image. Cheers and happy editing! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 22:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]Hello Renegadegill I noticed you're interested in getting adopted, I'd be willing to adopt you. Please kindly take a look at my Adoption Program and get back to me. Regards and a warm welcome, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 5:51pm • 06:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I haven't gotten a response from you as of yet, I noticed you've completed the signup method on my adoption talk page, if you would like me to become your adopter please do get back to me. If you don't see a course you'd like to take please do let me know and I will endeavour to do my best and create such a course. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:44pm • 05:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well now you've initiated the adoption process, add your name to the current adoptees list and choose a course you want to get started on. Any help you need, I'll be happy to provide. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:09am • 23:09, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Re: Adoption
[edit]Hello Renegadegill,
You previously expressed interest in being adopted; however, you have not provided correspondence to messages sent by the adoption program's members or have not indicated that you wish to stay on Wikipdia well after adoption. The Adoption program's adopters cater to the needs of adoptees, but cannot chase after potential adoptee's whose activity may be limited, due to the limited amount of adopters we have. Adoption is for those that want to stay, it is unfair for the adopters to have to teach to a user who will pack up their bags and leave after adoption or doing whatever it is they wanted to do.
Please understand our concern, but remember that if you do want to stay, you're more than welcome to join in the adoption program! Simply respond to this message indicating that you are active and I or another Adopter will get back to you shortly.
Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 3:41pm • 04:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article The Station (YouTube) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
YouTube "station" that was probably never notable and has certainly not shown that it has WP:SUSTAINED and permanent notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Station (YouTube) for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Station (YouTube) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Station (YouTube) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)