User talk:Renilo77

License tagging for File:Vetsotsu Kepfozu Nuh.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Vetsotsu Kepfozu Nuh.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Renilo77/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renilo77! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Renilo77. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Renilo77. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Renilo77|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the caution. However, I honestly disclose that this article is purely drafted for a person noteworthy to be mentioned. The article is not edited expecting compensation or received any financial aid or any form of profitable gains to be received from any source in the future, whatsoever. I submit and declare that my account may be banned action may be taken as per actionable terms as deemed fit by wiki on the event such anomalies are found. Renilo77 (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You took a picture of him, and he was clearly aware of this, so how do you know him in order to take a picture of him? 331dot (talk) 08:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unaware if I'm violating any of wiki regulations, I'm sorry if that's the case. However, he is known to me. I suppose someone had to write about someone who he knows him well. And so I have to a take his photo to upload it. Renilo77 (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know him? 331dot (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know him because he is from my village and he is a recognized leader not even in my chakhesang community but also in the greater Nagaland State of India. I admire him and I think he deserves to be included in esteemed wiki for researchers and also for young people who often approach him and looks for his biography..

I will be really grateful if you can kindly guide me through in making his biography acceptable. Since im very new and doesnt know how to make his article notable. There are many articles in google about him but I don't know how to cite and to which sentence. Kindly please help my village community.

Also, how do I contribute about villages under Phek district in Nagaland state of India? There are about 80 plus villages but only few minor villages are listed.. I want to write about almost all villages.

Will be looking forward for your guidance, please. Renilo77 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you just approached him on the street and asked him to let you take his photo for Wikipedia?

The biggest issue with your draft is that your references are not in-line with the information being referenced. This is vital for articles about living people. Please see Referencing for beginners.

Most established villages merit articles, but there still needs to be something written about them in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No... Not in any streets.. It was in his home. He is very old and senile now. The photo I uploaded was a photo taken in the earlier years.. But like I disclosed, I didn't do this draft for any kind of profit making. Neither am I writer nor experienced in writing as u can easily make out from my draft.. So I need your help as to how I could refine it further, and so needing your guidance.

Thanks for your inputs, definitely looks like I have to re-write everything again then make references proper for further scrutiny.

Regarding this one "Most established villages merit articles, but there still needs to be something written about them in independent reliable sources." I have sources, but the ignorance that I have being, I can't find the link to add village names and start writing on each village. The link I will find it now and send it for your reference Renilo77 (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here.. I want to add more villages since not all villages are listed. Some villages are hyperlinked with more description. Whereas some major villages are not even listed. For example, under phek-circle-chizami.. Some villages are not listed.

Also how do add village names? And how do I write a description for villages which have no description? I wish to contribute Renilo77 (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phek_district#/editor/9 Renilo77 (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may use the article wizard to help you create drafts. I would suggest you look at other articles about villages or communities to get an idea of the form and structure. I am unfamiliar with Indian villages to know good examples myself.

Regarding the gentleman you took a photo of, you must declare an unpaid conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How in declare? On my page? Or do I have to submit declaration from template form?

Ok. I have one more doubt.. This village under phek district, chizami circle have no citations but got published.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porba I want to create a village page somewhat like this for all other villages..

Can it be in the same manner as my biography draft now? By way of submitting another page? Renilo77 (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I disclose my declaration? Can it be in this form at the top of my page?

{{Unpaid|user=Renilo77|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} Renilo77 (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:COI for instructions on disclosing. 331dot (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Renilo77/sandbox

Hello, Renilo77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Renilo77/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]