User talk:Rihaan M

Welcome!

Hi Rihaan M! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 08:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to L2: Empuraan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: L2: Empuraan was changed by Rihaan M (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967757 on 2022-09-07T15:05:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at L2: Empuraan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at L2: Empuraan, you may be blocked from editing. Uhai (talk · contribs) 15:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Skipple. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fandom is not considered a reliable source, as content is user generated. Please see WP:RS/PS for more information. Skipple ☎ 17:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, you may be blocked from editing. See previous post regarding referencing Fandom Skipple ☎ 17:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Theerppu. Dl2000 (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Kathanar The Wild Sorcerer: Part 1. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kathanar - The Wild Sorcerer: Part 1 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kathanar - The Wild Sorcerer: Part 1, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathanar - The Wild Sorcerer: Part 1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kathanar - The Wild Sorcerer: Part 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/kathanar-director-rojin-thomas-technology-will-bring-9th-century-kerala-to-our-screens/articleshow/86557994.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Othiram Kadakam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Othiram Kadakam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Othiram Kadakam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khalifa - The Ruler moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khalifa - The Ruler, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Othiram Kadakam

Hello, Rihaan M

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kudpung, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Othiram Kadakam, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Othiram Kadakam

Hi Rihaan M. Please do not recreate Othiram Kadakam/Draft:Othiram Kadakam, given that it was the subject of an AfD. Using G7 to side-step the result of an AfD is disruptive. Please be advised that continuing to recreate this page will result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, FASTILY 09:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've decided not to heed my warning, I've blocked your account indefinitely. Thanks, FASTILY 10:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a beginner in Wikipedia and I started by doing small edits to pages. I don't promote vandalism and I only want to contribute to Wikipedia. I am learning just like everybody. The reason why I think I should be unblocked is because I was not doing anything wrong purposely. I was only creating a draft which I wanted to submit for review. So please, unblock me and I will not repeat what I have done. Thank you.

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you would have to commit to stop posting Othiram Kadakam. PhilKnight (talk) 06:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts ar the bottom, for proper discussion flow. You kept recreating the draft and seemed to ignore the posts on this page telling you why. Do you understand why you should not have recreated it? Would you commit to better heeding and replying to the comments of others? 331dot (talk) 13:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell us why you did not read any of the instructions or help pages before you started editing only a month ago? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did read the instructions but I don't know what happened wrong. Yes, I commit to better heeding and replying to the comments of others.

Rihaan M (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you were to recreate Othiram Kadakam or Draft:Othiram Kadakam after being unblocked, what do you think should happen to you? -FASTILY 05:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know but I think I would get what I deserve. Rihaan M (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also If you tell me what happened wrong it will be a great help. Rihaan M (talk) 05:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-read your talk page. If you've done that and still don't understand how you ended up blocked, then there's a good chance you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. -FASTILY 07:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When will I be unblocked? Rihaan M (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must make another unblock request. It will probably be your last on wiki chance to do it, so make it a good one, that does as has been requested of you. 331dot (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can I make another unblock request? Can you give me a redirect link? Rihaan M (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do so just as you did the prior two. Place it below. 331dot (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already made an unblock request at the Unblock Request Ticket System. I don't seem to know which method you meant. Rihaan M (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Ticket Request System Rihaan M (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that I have to use the unblock template? Rihaan M (talk) 14:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The unblock template? Rihaan M (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, UTRS is only for using if you lose access to this page, or your request involves very personal information. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #64504 was submitted on 2022-10-23. This review is now closed.

Can you unblock me? Rihaan M (talk) 12:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've said what you need to do. 331dot (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a second appeal on UTRS. Rihaan M (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting a reply that the reason is not enough to convince the administrators. Rihaan M (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should appeal here, not on UTRS. You did it twice before. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the unblock template? Please give Yes or No. Rihaan M (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Rihaan M (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rihaan M". The reason given for Rihaan M's block is: "Disruptive editing: repeatedly recreating Draft:Othiram Kadakam after warnings, blocked until ready to contribute constructively".

Blocking administrator: ‪Fastily‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. I don't understand the difficuly you have having with making an unblock request that you have already done twice. I'm getting very close to removing your access to this page on competence grounds, but I will give you one final chance to make a proper unblock request, that is placed below this one(not at the top of the page). 331dot (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I look at the block expiry, it is either saying that this block will expire in this given date at this given time or this block will not expire. Can you explain what is happening? Rihaan M (talk) 16:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no expiration date on the block. Do you intend to make an unblock request? 331dot (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Rihaan M (talk) 01:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do I have to do for it get approved? Can you give some advice? Rihaan M (talk) 01:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should I make the unblock request with the unblock template? Rihaan M (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What will happen if I get unblocked again? Rihaan M (talk) 12:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my mistakes and the consequences of it. I promise to contribute constructively. You can have my word. I won't do anything unnecessary. I just want to contribute to this encyclopaedia. Beginners often make mistakes and I have also made one. Please understand me and unblock me. I don't and won't promote vandalism and I will only do what is to be done. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This still doesn't address the reason for you block. As below, you're also making things more difficult for yourself by appearing to have competence issues. I suggest you read through the relevant rules pages before asking more questions or making another unblock request. To be unblocked, you must demonstrate that you understand our rules. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331 dot, my name is in the list of autoblocks. What should I do? Rihaan M (talk) 11:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. That will be removed when this block is removed. 331dot (talk) 11:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So will I get unblocked? Rihaan M (talk) 12:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That will be up to the next administrator to review your request. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to know when I will get unblocked? Rihaan M (talk) 13:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no specific timeframe. Admins are volunteers doing what they can do when they have time to do it. You can increase the chances of a review by being much more detailed about what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make. Specifically, you can respond to the suggestion above that abandoning editing about Othiram Kadakam may help. 331dot (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is now showing that my block is infinite.

Rihaan M (talk) 15:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what it should say, because it is. I'm finding your questions puzzling. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When will the other administrators review my request? Rihaan M (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I answered that question already. 331dot (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rihaan M, your behavior during this unblock attempt is making it increasingly likely that your request will be promptly declined due to WP:CIR. DMacks (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rihaan M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason that I got blocked was because I made an article which met one of the deletion criteria. So, I made a draft on the same but got blocked saying that I didn't heed the warning. Now that I know my mistake, I won't do it ever again and will edit constructively. I will heed all the warnings given by the administrators and create according to the criteria mentioned. Thank you and please unblock me.

Decline reason:

It's becoming completely clear to me that you do not have the competence to edit here. I'm also removing talk page access as well because this has become a timesink. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot, nothing is happening about my block. Rihaan M (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My name is in the list of autoblocks. What should I do? Rihaan M (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalifa - The Ruler (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fifthapril were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khalifa - The Ruler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fifthapril (talk) 06:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rihaan M! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fifthapril (talk) 06:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Khalifa - The Ruler has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Khalifa - The Ruler. Thanks! Fifthapril (talk) 06:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:L2: Empuraan

Hello, Rihaan M. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:L2: Empuraan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]