User talk:Rimsky.cheng

Speedy deletion nomination of Traxon Technologies

Hello Rimsky.cheng,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Traxon Technologies for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jayakumar RG (talk) 03:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rimsky.cheng, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rimsky.cheng! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Traxon Technlogies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Traxon Technlogies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. C759 (talk) 02:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Your recent editing history at Traxon Technologies shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Meters (talk) 07:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page Stalking by Deb

All this start after I initialize the DRN for Traxon Technologies.

Voltage Sensitive Relay (cur | prev) 10:24, 22 September 2014‎ Deb (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,227 bytes) (+70)‎ . . (tag) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 16:39, 21 September 2014‎ Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,157 bytes) (-92)‎ . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Typical 24V Voltage Sensitive Relay.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Krd (Copyright violation: all over internet https://www....) (undo) (cur | prev) 11:00, 21 September 2014‎ Rimsky.cheng (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,249 bytes) (-87)‎ . . (undo)

Talk:National Semiconductor Redirect[edit] Redirect this page to Texas Instrument since Texas Instrument acquired National Semiconductor. Instead content should be put as part of Texas Instrument Article. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

|I'm undoing the redirect. NS has been an important player in the semiconductor industry for 40 years or so, and had its own corporate history distinct from TI. NS as a distinct entity may have ceased to exist, but that doesn't mean the WP article should just disappear into thin air.Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

I disagree. National semiconductor is a company no longer notable and the content should be move to the main page Texas Instrument. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with your position. Historical information remains relevant even if the company no longer exists. In this particular case, I was looking for some historical information on NS but ended up at the TI article which did not contain the info I was looking for, while the NS article does. Your line of reasoning may be valid for e.g. a startup that gets acquired by some large company before it manages to have significant impact by itself, but not for a company that has been a significant presence in its field for 40 years. Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Any related history and information could be included in the main article. Being part of another article doesn't mean that it is not being informative. Thanks. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 09:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

The redirect proposal appears to be a pointy one based on the proposer's own experience as a paid editor. I see no reason for it and will not support it. Deb (talk) 10:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC) Please provide evidence to support your argument. From my point of view: 1. Texas Instrument acquired National Semiconductor[1] 2. National Semiconductor no longer have product lines of their own 3. Additional and Notable Information could be included under Texas Instrument Main Page

Thanks. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

What argument? From your point of view, a page you created was redirected because you did not provide adequate references or evidence of notability. You looked around for a company with a similar profile, but you failed to take into account that two wrongs don't make a right. This article will not be redirected without consensus - so, unless you can find an established editor who agrees with you, it will be staying where it is. Deb (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC) I am looking at the issue objectively, it is about National Semiconductor being part of the Texas Instrument. The content is not notable enough to have an article of its own. The content of this article could well be included in the Texas Instrument page to enrich its portfolio. Also, it would make the whole thing more organized and easy to understand. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC) There are plenty of examples of this in existence on the project, so your argument does not hold water. Deb (talk) 12:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC) Jump up ^ http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703712504576243133367045662. Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please take note of this extract from Wikipedia:Harassment: "Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam."

I know that you are a paid editor working for Traxon Technologies and that you have not declared your conflict of interest. I know that you are trying to promote the company you work for. Your best course of action is to own up to it and start learning how to edit from a neutral point of view. Deb (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stalking and follow almost every pages I am editing and doing discussion, in which to specifically give a point of view against my own. While giving a point of view against my own do not really constitute bad stalking, doing so is on the borderline of Wikipedia:Harassment. Although I am not really sure what wikipedia policy is on this, I am sure this is not a encouraged behavior. I would politely ask you to stop stalking my edits, or I would be forced to ask for other assistance should the situation become severe enough. Thanks. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just quoted you the relevant policy. I advise that you immediately stop editing the article about your employer, as you promised to do when you raised the matter at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Deb (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I promise I stop editing the article? Rimsky.cheng (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here. Deb (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, where is the promise? Thanks. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 01:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Rimsky.cheng: Your behavior is turning into WP:TROLLING. If you don't want a ban/block, you are skating on thin ice. Jayakumar RG (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is slowly turning more about Talk:Traxon Technologies than the topic highlighted above. I would suggest all cease relevant discussion here. Any related discussion should be made under related dispute resolution notice thread instead. Thanks. Rimsky.cheng (talk) 03:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's now closed - it should never have been opened. Deb (talk) 08:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Traxon Technologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient lighting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DRN needs assistance

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]