User talk:Riveros11

A new start...

Dear Riveros11, Why does your signature say a different name (avyact7)? Can you please make them match? Otherwise, it's too confusing to track responses. Thanks, Renee --Renee 21:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making your names match. You're saying that someone else switched them without your permission? Or, are you saying you were a sockpuppet? (I hope not!) Thanks, Renee --Renee 22:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article BKWSU, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Green108 02:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BKWSU

I am sorry but it is very clear that you are acting as a meatpuppet for the BKWSU.

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as BKWSU. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Please see notice raised on arbcom page [1]

--AWachowski 01:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 23:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that reminder. The change I made has been reverted back. Is that sort of advertising permitted in Wikipedia? " Ex-Brahma Kumaris: An independent resource accurately documenting the beliefs and lifestyle of the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University, including many of its channeled messages"

Riveros11 (talk) 18:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks on third parties critics of your religion

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted or removed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. --Januarythe18th (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not personal information. It is wide available on the internet.[2] Read the talk page in the article. If you do not want that info, simply erase the whole paragrah that you added about "legal actions." Your name must be there, for you are a party of those legal actions.

Riveros11 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]