April 30

I have added back the abdication of Beatrix and Willem's investiture. Calling it non-notable is, quite frankly, ridiculous.--ukexpat (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering

Just wondering why you removed this material. Yours, Quis separabit? 13:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Clay Aiken. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on events and dates

If an event has a Wikipedia article about it, then it is notable. If a person is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article about them, then their birth and death is notable enough to be added to the dates. Please do not remove any more information where there is a Wikipedia article present. Thank you Asarelah (talk) 22:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vienna Circle

Hi, I'm currently trying to add birth and death days of notable mathematicians and logicians to the appropriate day-of-the-year articles. Your reverted most of my additions concerning members of the Vienna Circle, e.g. the birth of Gustav Bergmann on May 4, 1906. I wonder if the reason might be that you confused it with Vienna Circle (esoteric)? None of the people I added were related of the latter. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, please give a reason why you believe these dates to be non-notable in the sense of WP:BIRTHDOY. Each of the added persons has an own wikipedia biographic article; being scientists and the Vienna Circle being highly influential in philosophy of science, I believe they also meet the "more stringent requirements for Wiki-calendar articles" (cited from WP:BIRTHDOY, which doesn't specify them, however). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rlbarton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22nd may

Care to explain why you removed 2 legitimate date of births for both dale winton and Katie price ? I've mow undone your action. Repeats of this will result in an escalation

Your removal of events

Hi Rlbarton, I have noticed that some of your list removals such as this, this, and this could all be argued as being notable. I was just wondering what you consider to be the requirements for notability in lists such as these? Bakilas (talk) 05:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think User:Bakilas was owed a response to this, especially given your extraordinarily contentious, arguably dishonest reason for removing the Catalonia listing at October 27. For what it's worth, I strongly disagree that the listing is not notable. (As usual, an IP editor has reinstated it.) Please consider discussing before removing again. City Of Silver 22:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

🎅History of December 25th🤶[🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 21:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for the your edit on my history of December 25th is there a way that we can document a death of a veteran on Wikipedia? I apologize for any grammatical or syntax errors in advance I use voice recognition because I am a disabled veteran . [🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 01:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by COACH ZARLINO (talk • contribs)

Hi COACH ZARLINO. I would recommend you read Wikipedia:Notability. It is appropriate to add an entry to a day of the year page for someone who meets those guidelines. Generally someone who has an article about them has already passed the notability test, and may be included.

In addition, your edit included emoji and did not match the style of other entries.

I hope this is helpful. Let me know if you have questions. = paul2520 (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

your removal of events from November 17

Hi Rlbarton, I reverted this edit that you made. As other editors have mentioned on your talk page (above), if an event has a Wikipedia article, it is notable. Why are you removing events without better explanation? Please give a good reason - or discuss on Talk:November 17 if you think something is being included but should not be. = paul2520 (talk) 21:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard discussion about you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Hi Rlbarton, I am sad it has come to this, but as you have repeatedly removed events from days of the year that appear to be notable, and have not responded to any related comments on your talk page (see above), I have reported you for investigation. See here for the thread. = paul2520 (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Warning I regret to report that an examination of your editing history has given cause to a number of editors to question a wide range of your edits, especially on lists relating to days of the year. Your persistent refusal to respond to questions raised on your talk page about this editing and also at this discussion on ANI has only reinforced these concerns. Therefore, I have advised that any edits you have made up to the present date that are deemed questionable can be reverted without further attempts to communicate with you. And I am further notifying you that if this pattern of controversial editing and refusing to explain or defend your edits continues, it will be treated as a specie of disruptive editing. This notice should be regarded as a formal warning. YVR -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

#NoDramaZone

help

Hello I apologize in advance I use voice recognition I am a disabled veteran with sight and hearing issues so once again I apologize for any grammatical or syntax errors in advance it does seem though that the AI on this voice recognition software is getting somewhat better. Being a new editor I don't want to start any crap but can somebody explain to me what's going on here this looks like a lot of technical mumbo-jumbo I'm a retired Navy veteran and mumbo-jumbo is a very sophisticated term. So the gentleman that passed away on November 1st is a Korean veteran and he served his country in the United States of America and I was just curious that was my edit in in proper form or did I do something wrong to make somebody upset?

I am relatively new at this and I love to help others create new white space on Portals like this one. If anybody can help me white label the historical value of a Korean veteran passing away on the history page that had a very large gap in it I might say I didn't think one little edit would make a difference apparently I started a ruckus. .

. .

. . 🎅🇺🇸 [🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 21:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC) [🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 21:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rlbarton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Travis

You need to stop deleting content that is well-supported by a number of facts and citations. This is not just disruptive: having lived in this area for many years, I've seen too many lives lost on Lake Travis -- as have the community leaders, who created programs in response and which the edits you're deleting speak to. Consider: your deletions can in fact cause people to be put at risk -- or worse -- despite the community leaders' best intentions. --108.178.113.114 (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So I just noticed that this guy is adding this "content" over and over again. I just deleted it myself, for the second time. To the 108.178.113.114 guy: just because you've "seen too many lives lost on Lake Travis", that doesn't make it okay to just use Wikipedia as a billboard for your personal safety crusade. To Rlbarton: is it possible to get this guy to stop? Andrew Englehart (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Service is Appreciated

	The Rlbarton Award for Extreme Pedantry
	Thank you for years of autistic trawling of every OTD page. Fredo699 (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 17

Why did you revert my edit including Marcia Freedman on the May 17 births? Asarelah (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rlbarton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on November 4

Hello. I recently noticed that you removed a completely fine event on November 4 for no apparent reason. The death doesn't need a citation, it just needs a link to a Wikipedia page, which it has. I've also noticed that you've already had a history of edits similar to this fashion. Can you please stop editing disruptively? EMachine03 (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some questions

Hi there, I just want to contribute but may I know why my contribution was undone? What is No Citation mean? Sculture65 (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 29 notabillity

Windows 10 is notable, because it is a major OS, and still is the #1 OS today. 98.148.167.84 (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]