User talk:RobertJohnson35

This is RobertJohnson35's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spanish Christian-Muslim War (1172-1212) has been accepted

Spanish Christian-Muslim War (1172-1212), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sack of Tétouan (1399) has been accepted

Sack of Tétouan (1399), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sack of Lisbon (798) (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"then he decided to sack it", not very formal and also sourceless; on a short article such as this with few footnotes, more context and sourcing may be required here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sack of Lisbon (798) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobertJohnson35! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sack of Lisbon has been accepted

Sack of Lisbon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 11:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RobertJohnson35. Thank you for your work on Muslim conquest of Majorca. Another editor, Alalch E., has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article. If you could bring it to a better state that could be great. There is content about the Muslim conquest of Majorca in the article Conquest of Majorca.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 15:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus

Sorry about the separate revert of your change, I meant to do a "restore earlier version", but did a "rollback", which only removes the last author's change. I've since undone the original section addition. Tarl N. (discuss) 02:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. I don't believe he's a Sephardic Jewish either, at least for now, but I wanted to expand the citation because I had already used it in Origin theories of Christopher Columbus and the citation in Cristopher Colombus was just a link to the same source. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 09:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]