Jump to content

User talk:Rockcommer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave me a message
What Is this?
You are getting hypnotised...

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Rockcommer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

[edit]
File:Animalibrí.gif

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Zindagi (TV channel). Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shukriya(Show) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this is not a sound revert. The Wikipedia community only wants sources that have been established as being reliable. That means we use sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and clear editorial oversight, not sites that are still building a reputation. Blogs are virtually never acceptable as references, because any yahoo can open a Blogger account, use a news site template and start pretending to be an entertainment news site. If you are frustrated that there is a lack of reliable sources for the content you are submitting, that is understandable, but that does not mean we should add substandard references, and the burden is on the person submitting the content to find the reliable sources, not on the person removing the unreliable ones. Note also that Wikipedia has no deadline. We are not in a hurry to add up-to-the-minute content that we need to use poor references. Hope this helps explain community standards a little better. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, related to the above note, and regarding these recent edits, please note that IMDb is not considered a reliable source by the Wikipedia community, because it is user-generated. Please see WP:RS, WP:RS/IMDB and WP:TVFAQ. I strongly recommend familiarizing yourself with what sorts of sources are considered reliable, so you can avoid these pestering notes. :) Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screencap use at Mahira Khan

[edit]

Please do not add screencap images of living persons to biography articles that have been uploaded using a fair use rationale. Images of living persons cannot be claimed under fair use policy as they nearly always fail Non-free content criteria number 1, specifically "No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." As long as it is possible that there could be a free image of the subject available for use, or there could be one available in the future, then fair use cannot be claimed for the copyrighted images. Thank you,--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shukriya (television show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ishq Mein Teray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IST. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rockcommer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rockcommer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]