User talk:Rodney.k.b.parker

Rodney.k.b.parker, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rodney.k.b.parker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early Phenomenology (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Early Phenomenology.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheQ Editor (Talk) 01:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early phenomenology has been accepted

Early phenomenology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Early phenomenology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early phenomenology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early phenomenology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Many people see their work nominated for deletion and let the frustration get the better of them, abandoning it or reacting angrily. You persisted and [though the AfD isn't done yet] it looks like it's heading for a positive result thanks to your work. Thanks for sticking it out -- I hope you'll keep going with it. — Rhododendrites ^talk \| 07:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dominican University College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licentiate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DUC logo.jpg

The file File:DUC logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:DUC-Logo-FullColour.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:10, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]