User talk:Rohinisinghaliya
Hi users,Myself Rohini Singhaliya,Please dont use talkback templates on my talkpages,I won't respond it.If you've a problem just post on my talkpage I'll gladly solve your problem.
thank you
[edit]Thanks for your help on Valmiki Caste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avanishnayakaz (talk • contribs) 07:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Talkback templates
[edit]How do you know about talkback templates if you are a new editor? Have you edited the same articles under a different account, or is yours a true "clean start" account? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- By the way, messing around with Sitush's web page is not a good idea. Every one of your edits is logged and visible to other editors. Please knock it off. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes it's my true "clean start" account.And can you help me about warn someone if he is messing with existance of an article??Rohinisinghaliya (talk) 08:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you try a "clean start" and instead make a "dirty start", you are in great danger of being blocked, so I urge caution. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
ok thanks for info by the way I hope u know about warning someone how to warn him by a template please help mrRohinisinghaliya (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- You are making a serious mistake. Sitish is not vandalizing anything, and your false accusations reflect far more negatively on you than they do on him. WP:BOOMERANG is something that you ought to read. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 09:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
He has messed with all article and you're saying it's not vandalism??Rohinisinghaliya (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I think cullen is Sitish's another fake account,how to report it??Avanishnayakaz (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
You don't need templates
[edit]You don't need warning templates, Rohinisinghaliya. Do you think using a template makes your warning look somehow more "official"? It doesn't. If you really have reason to warn somebody (although civil discussion is usually more appropriate than "warnings" where content issues are concerned), then it's much better to use your own words to describe what you specifically have a problem with. Templates are too general. That's because they're intended for actual vandalism. Please read the introductory paragraph to the policy WP:Vandalism to see what vandalism is. Accusing Sitush of vandalism is absurd, and, as Cullen328 has told you, reflects negatively on you, not on Sitush.
I'm not sure you understood Cullen's question about editing under a different account previously. Saying this is a "clean start" account means that you've had a previous account. Have you? You're only allowed to create a new account for a clean start; not for the purpose of continuing previous conflicts. That would count as an attempt to evade scrutiny. Please read the first paragraph of WP:CLEANSTART to see how that works. If you'll tell me here what your previous account was, I'll take a look to see if using this current account is OK. Bishonen | talk 11:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC).
It's my first account on wikipedia,got it?Rohinisinghaliya (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
He accused you for that vandalism and he is taking side of sitish hahaha but I'm with you RohiniAvanishnayakaz (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Valmiki
[edit]If you look at the contribution history for Valmiki Caste then you will see explanations for every edit that I have made recently, bar the last one. The last one is an automated edit summary and for technical/policy reasons I didn't actually intend to do it in that way, although the outcome (reversal of your edit) would have been the same.
If you do not understand any of my edit summaries then feel free to ask but, please, do not accuse me of being drunk or of being a vandal. I'm human and so I make mistakes; in the context of caste articles on Wikipedia, such mistakes tend to be very few and far between. - Sitush (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush,Please take caste based articles seriously because it belongs to a community and your mistakes can defame wikipedia so I told you,I'm Sorry if you felt badRohinisinghaliya (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |