User talk:Rolando8891

This is Rolando8891's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto G. Carbone (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberto G. Carbone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rolando8891! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Roberto G. Carbone

Hello, Rolando8891,

Thank you for creating Roberto G. Carbone.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It's worth have a look at the criteria to see whether any of them are met; it's not clear that they are, and some of the references in the article don't support the claims being made (particularly in the Honours and awards section) or are unreferenced. It seems that most of the work is through contribution to large collaborative efforts. Thank you for noting your COI on your user page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 10:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Roberto G. Carbone. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You also removed the short description, and I can't see what the purpose of doing this was. If you use the edit summaries that can help to explain your actions. Klbrain (talk) 13:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconveniece.

It was my error, in relation to the Roberto G. Carbone page, I would like to inform you that the page should no longer be considered orphan because a direct link to and from a related Wikipedia page has been inserted. (Peter J. Barnes).

I get to work on lengthening the lead section and finding references for notabilty. Thank you. All The Best Rolando8891 (talk) 07:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rolando8891, you removed the content tags again. If you do this again, without addressing the article's problems, you are liable to be blocked for disruptive editing. It also reveals that you have a COI regarding this article that might involve paid editing. Without disclosing this, you are also liable to be blocked. Don't try to take shortcuts over content improvements. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I unintentionally broke the rules, but before deleting the tags I had improved the page and in my opinion I had solved the problems you highlighted. Specifically, it is true that I have a COI with the subject of the page and it is easily verifiable on my discussion page and I honestly do not agree that the article needs copy editing, given that I wrote it together with an academic native English speaker. For the rest of the problems I will see if I can improve the page further, but from my point of view it seems in line with other biographical pages of other scientists in the field of medicine (even very famous ones). Thanks anyway for the help. Rolando8891 (talk) 07:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Rolando8891, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]