User talk:Roshni Kanchan

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Roshni Kanchan. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- The Voidwalker ^Whispers 03:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Happy? (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove the chapter summary. Notability not established

Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Hi Gbawden, will the notability be established as per Notability for Books for my article? I'm sorry for the multiple messages to you - there is a lot of How-to material to go through and it gets a little confusing. Thank you. --Roshni Kanchan (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The chapters and notability aren't linked. The chapter summaries are unnecessary and make the article very promotional. For notability see WP:NBOOKS. I don't know how long the draft will stay I'm afraid but should remain in your sandbox indefinitely. Gbawden (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Roshni Kanchan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:40, Friday, October 14, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Creating new article

Hey Roshni, I want to create an article on Dr Rajlakshmi SJ , an inspiring disabled girl in Bengaluru. Can u help me? TUSHAR KARMARKAR (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tushar, I am also a new editor whose total edits have been totally undone as of two days ago. :) But from the limited editor experience, I'd like to make two suggestions:

Let the article be deleted. You can always create a new one when you have sufficient material on the topic.
Please have a look at Sudha Chandran's article and learn about the formatting, sections required, references required etc and model your article on it.

It doesn't appeal to me to copy text from one page on the internet and paste to another, for a person I've not seen, heard or know in anyway. However I'll be happy to review your completed draft article for language, completeness, formatting, neutral point of view and any other wiki-jargon I may have understood by then. :) Good luck!

(P.S.

Modelling your article after another article doesn't guarantee that it won't be deleted. But the alternative is to go crazy jumping from one how-to article to another and drowning in jargon!! So I'd still suggest to look at other articles.
Do contact TheBetterIndia.com also - they are always on the lookout for such positive and inspiring stories)

--Roshni Kanchan (talk) 03:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rosh :) ...I have written to editorial@betteribdia.com suggesting an article on Dr Rajlakshmi. Also, I will go through Sudha ma'am article as well, n try to correct my mistakes in editing for wikipedia. Thanks agn. TUSHAR KARMARKAR (talk) 11:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Roshni Kanchan. You have new messages at KuwarOnline's talk page.
Message added 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

KuwarOnline^Talk 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Happy?

Hello, Roshni Kanchan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "If You’re So Smart".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]