User talk:RossiyaCitizen22

Welcome!

Hi, RossiyaCitizen22. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Snabbkaffe (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Snabbkaffe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snabbkaffe (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

confused user! it is written in sources that NATO USA troops is in Ukraine. i understand that USA denies this. ukraine claims is allowed. we must also allow russia "claims" (facts).

The source you linked to did not claim that any branch of the US Military operates in the disputed area. When editing, add relevant sources and references. This is even more important when the information is controversial. "Claims" should be treated as such. I urge you to stick to facts. (And to sign your post on talk pages using four of these in a row ~). Snabbkaffe (talk) 00:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Marteau. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Donets Basin because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Marteau (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Volunteer Marek. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Boris Nemtsov. The material you have been adding to this article is not neutral. If you would like to add it, please discuss it on the talk page first. Discant X 02:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RossiyaCitizen22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NATO ENFORCERS!!!!! I HATE YOU! I PROVIDE THE SOURCES THE TRUTH. YOU PROTECT NATO FROM SOURCES? NO NEUTRAL I NTHIS PROJECT? YUKRAINE CLAISM!!!! IT IS CLAIMED BY UKRAIEN BY NATO BY USA!!!! WHAT ABOUT RUSSIA CLAIMS??? SCUM EDITOR NATO ENFORCER!!!!! TAKE THIS BAN OFFFFFFF I

Decline reason:

This isn't helping. Kuru (talk) 02:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

thank you enforces for freeing me. i'm glad you see truth

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCUM ENFORCERS! YOU BLOCK AGAIN???? TRUTH???