User talk:STiLL DRE

Welcome!

Hello, STiLL DRE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jclemens (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sumner Redstone, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sumner Redstone was changed by STiLL DRE (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-22T17:11:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Colbert

Apologises if it was a genuine edit to the article. To me it looked like an attempt of vandalism because the quote that was added did not really seem to fit in with the rest of the text. Also without any references on the quote it did not seem at first glance to be correct. I would recommend you to find a reference to back up the quote and replace it back into the article. Sorry again. Tresiden (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Riker out

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Riker out, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Anonymous101 (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That band

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not the place to write about your band. We do have articles on some bands, but only after they've gotten significant media coverage. Otherwise there are no sources for us to use, and encyclopedias use sources. From the description in the article (being a basement band with no record label) it seems quite unlikely that proper sources exist on this topic. Friday (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright. Well, if it's not your band, hopefully there's no conflict of interest. Still, though, the article is unsourced. Being in the process of getting a record deal doesn't mean much here- we can only go by what proper sources have reported. Friday (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Scjessey (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]