User talk:SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA

Provide me source or url.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 16:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chennai Express may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com/movies/review/music-review-chennai-express-has-some-aces-up-its-sleeve/20130704.htm|publisher=[[Rediff.com]|author=Joginder Tuteja|date=4 July 2013|accessdate=7 July 2013}}{{Rating|3.5|5}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nasha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| producer = Surendra Suneja<br/><nowiki>Aditya Bhatia]</nowiki>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IANS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I've gone and done it. Regards, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Express First day nett collection of BOI and other reliable Wikipedia sources vary by 4 crore!!its a huge difference

First day nett collection of BOI and other reliable Wikipedia sources vary by 4 crore!!its a huge difference.Reliable trade websites like Bollywood Hungama,KoimoiTimes of India,CNN-IBN,IBNLive,India Today ,Indian Express and trade experts like Taran adarsh gave chennai Express first day nett. gross at Rs 33.12 crore,more than what Box Office India is propagating at Rs 29 crore. Below are URLs: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/special-features/id/228
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/special-features/id/229
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/special-features/id/230
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/box-office/Chennai-Express-beats-Ek-Tha-Tiger-on-day-one-earns-Rs-33-crore/articleshow/21741131.cms?
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/chennai-express-mints-rs.33.12-crore-on-opening-day/1/298931.html
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shah-rukh-khans-chennai-express-collects-rs-39-cr-creates-history/1153658/
http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/chennai-express-sets-thundering-pace-113081000045_1.html

This is high time that Wikipedia should reconsider its basis of including gross figures for Bollywood films We should discard BOI now,which is now and then unavailable,Bollywood Hungama is much better which gives detailed gross of overseas also ,apart from domestic record in table.--Tarandhoni (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot continue to use BOI as it is now showing huge difference.

We can't just ignore other reliable trade websites and trade experts who give same data and BOI who has started to show nett gross figures less by 4-5 crore for a single day.Its high time we should discuss on wikipedia that Box Office Mojo can't be compared to Box Office India.BOxofficeMojo data are used by trade websites in Holllywood,but BOI data is not used.The Alexa ranking of BOI is way below which proves that BOI i not much searched website .For high grossing Bollywood films we have to go with reliable trade websites.I am also fan of BOI,but when huge disparity comes,I try to avoid BOI.See below some more reliable Wiki websites who quote Chennai express first day collections at Rs 33.12 crore,beating Ek tha tger.Even BOI has decred Ek tha tiger figures from its previous Rs 31.25 crore to Rs 30.25 crore.What the hell is BOI doing?

http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/1872682/report-chennai-express-mints-rs33-12-crore-on-opening-day
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Shah-Rukh-Khan-starrer-Chennai-Express-mints-Rs-33-crore-on-opening-day/Article1-1106072.aspx
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarandhoni (talk • contribs) 17:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]