User talk:Saaduddin20

Welcome!

Hello, Saaduddin20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page See TV has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to See TV, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're trying to change See TV. What are the sources you're working from for your information? If you have links where I can review them, I'd be glad to help you with any updates that are in order. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Eric-Wester. I noticed that in this edit to Samaa TV, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eric-Wester (talk) 19:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geo News. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Geo News was changed by Saaduddin20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970073 on 2016-12-04T19:58:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saaduddin20, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Passenger pigeon (talk) 10:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saaduddin20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i admit it that i made a mistake in past but i want to resolve it as you already know that i created artile SEE TV many times but deleted but i promise i will not do it again Saaduddin20 (talk) 11:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That does not address the reason for your block, which is the abusive use of multiple accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saaduddin20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason is, in 2015 to 2018 someone create out company article See TV with wrong information about our leadership just why all the account which i created was for to resolve that issue but couldn't Saaduddin20 (talk) 12:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are serious WP:CIR concerns here. Yamla (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Muhammad, if you want your unblock request to succeed, you have to address your sockpuppetry and promise not to do it again. Also, you are unlikely to be unblocked if you have any intention of promoting yourself or SEE TV again, both of which are topics that have been determined via the deletion process to not be notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia; it is up to you to convince administrators that you will stay away from topic areas that have caused problems in the past. In addition, part of the Standard Offer (your most likely route to getting unblocked) is that you wait six months after your last problematic edits before making an unblock request, with no sockpuppetry during that time. Passenger pigeon (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saaduddin20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me, i will do it again i promise Saaduddin20 (talk) 10:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's clear that a competent unblock appeal that addresses the issues is not going to be forthcoming. To prevent further timewasting, I have revoked talkpage access for this account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.