User talk:SagiSatya3

This is SagiSatya3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, SagiSatya3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
And feel free to make test edits in your own sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing!

Are you ready for editing?

The

Adventure

Hi SagiSatya3!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Sam Sailor 14:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review the guide to article creation and the manual of style. All bolding apart from the initial mention of the subject's name should be removed for the text. Citations need to be placed inline in accordance with the guidelines at WP:REFB. Peacock wording such as "a reputable physician, renowned scholar, and an exceptionally talented professional" should be reduced to basic description.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SagiSatya3/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SagiSatya3/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 13:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SagiSatya3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 13:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:SagiSatya3/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:SagiSatya3/sandbox. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sagi Satyanarayana, from its old location at User:SagiSatya3/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 14:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sagi Satyanarayana (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first challenge here is the total lack of secondary sources: if I google Sagi Satyanarayana I find nothing reliable. Same for the other transliteration Sagi Sathyanarayana.

All "sources" now presented are primary from https://sagisatya.wixsite.com/profile - did you make that yourself? - and one Youtube video uploaded by Sagi Satyanarayana, is that you?

Looking into just some of the bare claims made here, I question if they are factual; a few examples:

Yale University is in New Haven, Connecticut, not in New Jersey, and I doubt they have ever had Yoga & Neurobics as part of their program
University of Vienna is in Austria, not as listed in the US, and I doubt they have had Yoga & Asanas as part of their program.
Ligs University is a non-accredited online "university" that did not exist in 2000. And he has two Ph.D.s in yoga from this place?
Aroma University in the USA, where is that? I can't find any university of that name past and present.
Barry University is in Florida, but you list it as both in the UK (entry no. 16) and in New Zealand (entries no. 22 and 33) and claim that subject received two Ph.D.s from that university both in Public Health in 2014 and 2017.

And I could go on and on.

If we take a look at some of the claims made on the sagisatya.wixsite.com pages, which all look fake, I'm sorry to say they are just as incredible, ex.:

Checking a handful of the ISBN numbers on https://sagisatya.wixsite.com/profile/publications turns out nothing.

Sorry, but I smell a hoax here, prove me wrong by providing some solid sources.

Courtesy ping Eagleash.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sagi Satyanarayana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sagi Satyanarayana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor 14:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sagi Satyanarayana

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sagi Satyanarayana. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor 17:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Sagi Satyanarayana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Sagi Satyanarayana, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pahunkat (talk) 12:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Sagi Satyanarayana (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Sagi Satyanarayana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dr. Sagi Satyanarayana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that Wikipedia is not the place for you to post your résumé, curriculum vitae, or similar material. It is also unlikely that anyone will ever see it, and anyone can alter the info you post. Please read this policy page describing what Wikipedia is not. Your résumé or CV will soon be deleted as this constitutes advertising, which is not allowed. You may also want to read our policies on conflicts of interest and autobiographies. Thank you. Deb (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]