User talk:Sahimrobot
July 2010
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW (Talk) 17:48, 3 July 2010 (UTC)- This concept has been repeatedly rejected by the community as well, see WP:PEREN#Use_a_bot_to_welcome_new_users. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
unblock
[edit]Sahimrobot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm already familiar with policies! But now I'm familiar with policy. now i have flag in fa.wikipedia and ar.wikipedia.please unblock the robot! thank you.
Decline reason:
We cannot just unblock your bot - please re-read the message above, all bots have to be submitted and approved before they can be used. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock April 2011
[edit]Sahimrobot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Sahimrobot(request2) -- BRFA trial approved — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC) yes, thank you--sahim (talk) 13:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Accepted due to approved BFRA trial permission. It should have never taken a block and a declined unblock to get this done. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- thank you BWilkins--sahim (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Interwikis for disambiguation pages
[edit]Can you put in an exception on your interwiki bot for disambiguation pages so that interwikis don't get added automactically? These rarely translate properly, especially when dealing with languages that don't use roman alphabets. _dk (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)