User talk:Saint Jut

Please read

WP:3RR Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that I should report you? That's not my style. Saint Jut (talk) 20:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saint Jut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting IP address block exemption.

Decline reason:

Per below. ST47 (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Saint Jut (talk) 17:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saint Jut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP used by multiple people. You are incorrectly assuming that we are all one person. Saint Jut (talk) 19:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't know who is sitting at the computer or using the WiFi. CheckUser is not just based on IP address, either. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saint Jut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason has been provided for this block. When I was active I made normal edits, and had no conflict whatsoever. The same goes for the two other people I'm aware of that you have blocked at this IP. Surely if you block someone you should be able to say why.

Decline reason:

Yeah, the IP block and now direct block are working as intended. Revoking TPA and email, and I'll let nl.wiki admins know as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Saint Jut (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guido, your unblock requests tell me you haven't changed a bit. At some point, one imagines, one has become adult enough to be truthful--I am not holding my breath for that with you. Drmies (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]