User talk:Samir Bishal

Welcome!

Hello, Samir Bishal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Radhakrishnan Pillai, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 11:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Radhakrishnan Pillai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Radhakrishnan Pillai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 11:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Samir Bishal

Thank you for creating Sharly Modak.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @North8000:, please guide me and teach me whenever I'll do mistakes. Samir Bishal (talk) 09:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. For that particular article, the important next thing to do is to build content......Look at what the sources said about her and, in your own words, write that in the article. North8000 (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks for your reply and suggestion. One more thing, i have created a draft can you please check the draft and suggest me accordingly. And if the draft is ok, you can review the draft. Thanking you in advance. Samir Bishal (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a link or name on the draft? North8000 (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Here is the draft Draft:Radhakrishnan Pillai. Please check and guide me accordingly. Samir Bishal (talk) 04:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Samir Bishal. First one preface, I would tend to be tougher on and expect more on a draft or AFC article than I would be for NPP work. NPP work is based more on a projection of what would happen at AFD.

Next I'll note that if there was a hypothetical John Smith with the same editing history as yours I'd note that they are likely to have a tough time in Wikipedia because their editing history tends to look similar to paid editing. A focus on articles on persons where having an article in Wikipedia is likely to benefit their career or finances. Also articles where the text is mostly resume /CV type material. If that were the case, my advice would be to either declare or stop their paid editing and if it were not the case I'd advise them to diversify the type of editing that they do and to make sure that it is all under one account.

Now, with those hypothetical possibilities about John Smith aside, on to this article. It looks like there is plenty of material on Radhakrishnan Pillai in the sources that you have. Now you need to thoroughly read that material and start putting it into the article in your own words. And do a large expansion of the text in the article. Pick it more by what readers would want to read about him. Right now it just has a few sentences and only of resume / CV type material. Happy editing! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: I didn't get the John Smith point. But about Radhakrishnan Pillai, actually i am new on wikipedia. So i dont know how much information i can add. So added less information. and there is an editor name Nomadicghumakkad he also mentioned on his user page that if you are submitting any draft for review then put less information. Samir Bishal (talk) 06:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radhakrishnan Pillai (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radhakrishnan Pillai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samir Bishal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DoubleGrazing: thank you for going through Draft:Radhakrishnan Pillai and reviewed the draft. If you go through those news coverages you can see those coverages are falling under RS. Just take a look The Hindu, The Hindu, The Hindu, The Hindu, The New Indian Express, The New Indian Express, The Hindu, The Indian Express, The New Indian Express. So the question over here is "The Hindu" reliable ? The answer is YES. Same quesion is here with "The New Indian Express" and "Indian Express" are they Generally Reliale ? The answer is YES. So according to WP:RS the news coverages which I added there on the draft are all reliable. Please check those fact and guide me. If there are any other issue then guide me ill try to improve thank you. Samir Bishal (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing:,can i expect a reply om the same so that i can have better clarification about it ? Samir Bishal (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't decline this draft on the basis of unreliable sources. I declined it because the sources do not provide the kind of significant coverage required by the general notability guideline WP:GNG, and/or they are churnalism. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Thank you for the clarification. Would love to learn more from you. Samir Bishal (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Suitable Girl.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Suitable Girl.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Create 'Kohra (estate)' at Amethi in UP

Link is given below 👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kohra_(estate) DrhSR (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DrhSR: I don't have expertise in this topic. So please make yourself by reading guidelines and submit it for AFC or move the page on main space. Samir Bishal (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I had created the page please you can review the Draft DrhSR (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, please review the article Kohra (estate) DrhSR (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not a new page reviewer I am new here and learing just like you. Samir Bishal (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queeristan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queeristan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queeristan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Haueirlan (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sharly Modak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharly Modak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharly Modak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Haueirlan (talk) 05:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Samir Bishal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Haueirlan (talk) 09:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already read those guidleline. And i dont need this guidleline as I am not here to write promotional thing. By the way thank you for sending me the guidelines Samir Bishal (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DasSoumik per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DasSoumik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]