User talk:SanaNasir25

Concern regarding Draft:Universal Service Fund Pakistan

Hello, SanaNasir25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universal Service Fund Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Universal Service Fund Pakistan

Hello, SanaNasir25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Universal Service Fund Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Service Fund Pakistan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Universal Service Fund Pakistan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would love if you can elaborate which part of the article do you see is missing citation/resources. It is good to see that you take keen interest in articles pertaining to Pakistan. But its better if you can be specific.

The published article is complete in itself. And has been accurately sourced where needed. SanaNasir25 (talk) 10:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention this, but I took a look at the article a few days ago, and I've added some maintenance templates to it to point out some of the issues with it (such as the many statements missing citations, and the statements towards the end in need of expansion). So, if you're still in the mood to fix that article, take a look at those specific areas of Draft:Universal Service Fund (Pakistan). 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 16:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Universal Service Fund (Pakistan)

Hello, SanaNasir25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universal Service Fund (Pakistan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SanaNasir25. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Universal Service Fund (Pakistan), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal Service Fund (Pakistan) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Saqib were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Clear COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Universal Service Fund (Pakistan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SanaNasir25! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]