User talk:Sardeeph

Welcome!

Hello, Sardeeph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Nawaz Sharif. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

Given recent events, I think it would be advisable for you to be aware of the information below. - Sitush (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

I'd like to follow that up with some advice. When I (or any admin) close a request at WP:AE, it is closed and can't be re-opened. You can appeal it, but editing it is disruptive and if you do it again you will be blocked.

regentspark imposed that sanction on his own authority under arbitration discretionary sanctions and is therefore the only editor who can amend it, unless by consensus of admins at AE, consensus of editors at WP:AN or by motion of the arbitration committee. Whether or not it is what he intended is a matter you'll have to take up with him, but the sanction that is logged at WP:DSLOG is as amended and that is the sanction that will be enforced (it would be obviously unjust to do otherwise).

Now, please calm down and go do some useful editing. Continue as you are and you are going to be sanctioned very quickly. I understand (I think) that you're not exactly new here because you edited anonymously until recently, but all the same, registering an account and jumping straight into controversial editing and filing AE reports is not a look that goes down well. GoldenRing (talk) 18:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sandeeph. Since arbcom has imposed discretionary sanctions on all India/Pakistan articles, any admin can add restrictions on articles in that content space. I imposed those restrictions because of disruption on articles relating to the Kashmir conflict because of disruptive editing on those articles. The 1RR restriction was turning out to be onerous and so I later removed it. When these types of restrictions are in place, you should use the talk page to discuss your edits and you should edit with caution. I hope this explanation helps. Thanks. --regentspark (comment) 19:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LanguageXpert. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have temporarily blocked you for your continued wall-of-text attacks on User:Kautilya3, pending the outcome of the ANI discussion. If you want to request an unblock, place the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Any admin is free to reverse my action without needing my approval if they see fit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]