User talk:Sassf/archive1
Welcome
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. There is a lot to learn, so here are some links to pages that will help you to find your way around, get to know the most important policies. When you need to ask a question or seek assistance, you can visit pages such as the Help Desk, Editor Assistance or the New Contributors' Help page. They all fulfill different rôles depending on what kind of help you need. If you would like direct access to an experienced editor, you can join the adopt-a-user project or just approach someone directly via their discussion page. Remember to sign whenever you leave a comment by using four tildes (~~~~) or 
. Whenever you edit a page, even if the edit is minor, you should include a descriptive edit summary. I really hope that you enjoy being a Wikipedian and find it a rewarding experience. - Adrian M. H. 20:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I have replied to your question at NCH. Adrian M. H. 20:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Your edit on Talk:Indian_Rebellion_of_1857
[edit]You have a reply on that page, and if possible you are invited to speak up in the last three sections. --Bobby Awasthi (talk) 12:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Help
[edit]{{helpme}}
I came across this article David Henry Wilson whilst de-deadending things - it clearly needs sorting out. The subject himself has added a complete list of his works. I'm sure this isn't appropriate but I'm not sure what is the best thing to do about it. I know that the author's contact details definitely need removing (!!!) but I'm leaving the page as is for a little bit so whoever is kind enough to help me :-) can see the original page. Many thanks for any advice!Sassf (talk) 23:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for bringing this to our attention. In concern of that article, the best thing to do would be to put up some WP:CLEANUP tags on or improve it yourself; also, you may want to check up on notability of the subject to see if an article is appropriate. Hope that helps, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 23:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Just a couple of other questions if thats ok. I've noticed elsewhere subjects politely being told they shouldn't edit articles on themselves - do you think I should put something on his talk page? The subject is notable - he seems to have plenty of books on amazon so thats fine but re: him listing all his works on the page - do you think just pruning most of that out is the best thing to do? It just kind of looks like a cv otherwise... Sorry for all the questions, I don't normally tackle too many living people (on wiki, not RL ;-) and I feel a bit unsure about some of the best courses of action in the long run.Sassf (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Tackling in real life is even more fun. :) You're right, subjects of articles should ideally avoid from editing their own articles, as that may present a conflict of interest; even Jimbo Wales has been caught trying to edit his own article to fit his point of view. Also, the plenty of books part is great but I'd say check if they're self-published and also how much they've sold. And it does look like a curriculum vitae at this point; his list of works should preferably be trimmed or reworked.
- And don't worry about asking questions; if there's anything else you'd like to know, I'd love to help. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 23:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Re:James Fox (singer)
[edit]I noticed your conflict of interest flag on this article. I failed to get any response from the editor in question so I have gone ahead with a fair bit of tidying up and I have removed or re-worded much of the inappropriate content. Please check and let me know if you think this has been sufficient to merit the removal of the tag. Jud (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking at that so quickly. I had noticed a couple of days ago the fairly obvious COI and went back add the tag. I did see you'd only recently put a message on his page but seeing as I'd tagged the article I thought I better put it on his userpage too. I know what he'd written wasn't especially harmful but it read quite self promotionally and peacocky to me. I made a few more edits subsequent to your as there were a few terms that really were getting on my nerves a bit (frequent unsubstantiated use of 'popular' for instance). As for removing the tag its purely up to you but I think the article is a bit better now. Of course most of the info does come from the person with the apparent COI but at least most of it is referenced. Personally i think a few of the references are a bit dodgy (self-references to myspace and youtube) but I'm not really sure what can be done about that save tagging the article. Theres far too many external links too - if there's no tag for that I'm going to stick it on the talk page. Cheers! Sassf (talk) 23:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's a great improvement. I agree that the COI tag can probably be removed now, but I will continue to keep an eye on it. Clare Teal is a notable artist in her own right, (her name was misspelled, hence the red link) so that information could be replaced. Jud (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like I spoke too soon - the original editor appears to have resurfaced with a new user name and is continuing to add personal information. Perhaps you'd better put it back! Jud (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like you're right. I've readded the tag and I've posted some bits from the policies on the talk page in the hope the editor in question will bother to read them. If it continues I might list it on the suspected sock puppets page. He's not really doing any massive harm, its just all a bit promotiony, but it is against the guidelines so needs to stop. :-) Sassf (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like I spoke too soon - the original editor appears to have resurfaced with a new user name and is continuing to add personal information. Perhaps you'd better put it back! Jud (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's a great improvement. I agree that the COI tag can probably be removed now, but I will continue to keep an eye on it. Clare Teal is a notable artist in her own right, (her name was misspelled, hence the red link) so that information could be replaced. Jud (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Bouncer23 (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Hi I am not the original editor.............I am trying to get the page back into line, and sound interesting at the same time. I have read a lot of the bio's of other artists, please bear with me I am doing a bit at a time and I may make a few mistakes along the way....sorry It's not meant to be promotional ( I can't/am not speaking for the original editor) just trying too incorporate some factual back ground and I am reading the links honestly.............The original editor has not responded to any messages because they are currently indisposed.Bouncer23 (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again, the people who run James Fox's website have been in touch and have assured me that it is highly unlikely that the subject of the article was making these edits himself, (he is currently performing to the troops in Afghanistan), so it was probably just an over-enthusiastic fan. They also asked me to pass on their thanks to you for improving it by removing the inappropriate material.Jud (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Editor Assistance
[edit]After rereading my comments here, I don't think I explained myself clearly enough. What I meant was that although Auto is an important guideline, Ignore all rules is, too. This states that one should, "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." As long as Bouncer23 keeps contributing quality and verifiable edits to the article, there really is no reason to ask him to stop. However, the COI tag should stay on the article until any users possibly connected with James Fox stop editing it and consensus says that it is neutral. I have gone through the article and removed some Youtube links that were used as references. As long as experienced and neutral editors keep weeding this kind of stuff out, and the whole thing does not turn into an edit war or blantant advertising, I would advise leaving things alone. I hope this helps and does not make things more confusing! Let me know if these comments make no sense; it has been known to happen before with me. ;-) Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 22:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Rewrote it. Hurmata (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
See new subsection: Acting award claim. Hurmata (talk) 22:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your remarks. I'm afraid I am becoming too frustrated with the inertia of the ones who don't want change in the article. I appreciate your effort. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks much for your comment at Talk:Anthony Burgess:
"then the article must explain to those of us who have not read much of Burgess' work why these things are in fact so important. It should not be assumed that reader's are Burgess experts, the wiki article should explain to all readers the importance of his work and the relevance of various biographical minutiae to this work, not just list facts for fans and assume readers can work out relevance on their own accord"
- Wikipedia as a whole would greatly benefit from broader application of this attitude! -- 201.17.36.246 (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Fellow de-orphaner!
[edit]
I noticed you've been helping out trying to de-orphan the vast number of orphaned articles out there, and I'd like to say that we really appreciate your help. You might want to consider adding your name to the list of participants in WikiProject Orphanage, the WikiProject concerned with de-orphaning articles.
Here are some things you might want to do to get even more involved:
- Read the WikiProject Orphanage page, especially the section marked "Criteria". The page contains a lot of good advice on-deorphaning, as well as the standard procedures we are using to de-orphan articles.
- Look at {{orphan}},{{do-attempt}}, and {{articleissues}} closely and make sure you know how to use them correctly. (It's not difficult, but it is easy to screw up. Trust me, I have.)
- Keep de-orphaning! Category:Orphaned articles contains all orphaned articles organized by month. Right now we're just trying to keep up with all the new orphans being created, so please start with the current monthly category. Once those are cleared out, we can start working on the backlog in reverse-chronological order.
- You may have already known all of this, in which case sorry for the spam! Either way, Let me know if there's any way I can help you contribute more to the project. Thanks again!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 16:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
talkback2
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I'm not sure on the project actually. I think it might have become a bit inactive as ther was not much going on but it would be good to help to revive it. And your welcome on the reversion. Sorry for the few-days-later replySimply south (talk) 20:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
You're right
[edit]You were absolutely correct in adding A Little Girl Lost to the template... There are so many of them that I have trouble keeping them straight sometimes, and somehow missed this. My apologies, and I have undone my revert. The articles related to Songs of Innocence and Experience need a lot more work, and I hope to get to them some day. Sorry about that. Lithoderm 14:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Flagged Revs
[edit]Hi,
I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
[edit]The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
- The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 15:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The Resist Hivethink Award
[edit]
|
The Resist Hivethink Award. | |
| Best wishes my new found friend. I hope you paths cross again sometime soon. travb (talk) 03:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC) |
AfD nomination of -land
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, -land, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-land. Thank you. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 06:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD
[edit]Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Cup Redddogg (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
[edit]The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Got a message that you're trying to contact me on Skype. My Skype is a bit laggy today, so if you prefer email or gchat I'm also around. Best, DurovaCharge! 20:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
[edit]The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
[edit]The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
[edit]The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
[edit]The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
[edit]The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
[edit]The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
[edit]The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Are you still active in WikiProject Orphanage?
[edit]Hi there, I notice you haven't edited in a while. I'm currently cleaning up the member list at WP:ORPHANAGE, and have moved you to the Inactive list. If you still wish to be listed as "Active" just go ahead and move your name back. Regards, Ϫ 21:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
[edit]Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
[edit]The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
[edit]
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
[edit]The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
[edit]The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
[edit]The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
[edit]The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
[edit]The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Coordinator elections have opened!
[edit]Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
[edit]The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
[edit]The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
[edit]The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
[edit]
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
The Milhist election has started!
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
[edit]
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | |
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)