User talk:SattvaBodhi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SattvaBodhi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a Sockpuppet of the user 98.5% Chimpanzee - I simply agree with this user that the current article for Rejuvenation Research is heavily biased and not adequately sourced. SattvaBodhi (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but this is really obviously the same person as 98.6% Chimpanzee and User:Mr. Thoreau. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of 98.5% Chimpanzee (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]