User talk:Sayitright22

January 2023

Your recent edits to Talk:Grigori Grabovoi could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you. Sayitright22 (talk) 19:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grigori Grabovoi. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly only here to advocate for Grigori Grabovoi. This is your last chance before you are reported as WP:NOTHERE. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sharing information that is truthful, that is all. I am not intended to vandalize, but to contribute. I apologize if my contributions made that impression, which are not intended with malice at all. The Wikipedia website is for everyone to collaborate with reliable information, and this is reliable information, dear Lard Almighty.

I hope you find it in your soul that this is not an attack but simply a contribution. Thank you. Sayitright22 (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using talk pages as forums

Please do not use talk pages as forums. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Grigori Grabovoi for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sayitright22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my lack of knowledge about how to use Wikipedia has caused for me to get blocked. No malice intended. I want to contribute to improve the Article with reliable sources and with the truthful information, and I commit to read all the policies and try my best to understand how to do it. I believe that all contributions add value to the website, and I hope you give me the opprotunity to demonstarte that I am commited to follow protocolsSayitright22 (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We expect you to read the policies now, while you were blocked. I mean, we expected you to read them before, when you were warned you were violating them. You didn't, but now's the time. Once you've read and understood them and can explain why your edits were inappropriate, feel free to make a new unblock request. Not before. Yamla (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, as you have demonstrated you are not capable of writing appropriately about Grigori Grabovoi, it's very likely any unblock would require a WP:TOPICBAN on that subject. Even that may not be enough. --Yamla (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]