User talk:Scienceisyourfriend

Well, hello, this is scienceisyourfriend, the people on other websites might know me as notagh.

Just so you people know I'm here, and I'm protecting those links.

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/August 2008#scienceisyourfriend. SoxBot X (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Scienceisyourfriend! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! ScienceApologist (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Some places you might be able to help us

Please check out WP:FTN and Wikipedia:WikiProject Rational Skepticism.

Nice to have you on board!

ScienceApologist (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I'll try to help out!

Scienceisyourfriend (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

psilinks.net

I put an explanation on Talk:Psionics#Link Vandalsim, Persisant, but you seem to be a pretty new user editing in good faith. However, a link to an internet forum really just does not cut it as an encyclopedia-enhancing external link. Perhaps when the full site is back online you can bring it up on the talk page, but until then there is no consensus that it be added. Good work cleaning out Astral projection, though. - Eldereft (cont.) 23:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And the website is up again, and I do not mind the removal of the links, unless there is malicious intent, which had led me to add and remove at the beginning. If it violates wikipedia guidelines, I can remove it myself. Scienceisyourfriend (talk) 03:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

The linkspam discussion at Talk:Psionics has turned against you. I'm giving you a fair chance to reply before your reputation gets damaged any more. Themfromspace (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oops.. didnt see that someone else made mention of it..... Themfromspace (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psionics links & whatnot.

Hello there. I've been reviewing the history of Psionics and I noticed that you have several times either added or removed links from the links section. I was wondering what your specific reasoning was for removing these links. I have reviewed all of them before adding them back and they seem to be perfectly valid references for parapsychology psionics. Thank you very much and I look forward to hearing back from you. Please respond on my Wikt talk page as is linked in my signature, thank you.--Neskaya _talk 17:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neskaya (talk • contribs) [reply]