User talk:Sciophobiaranger

This user is against hating. Don't hate!

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Dear Sciophobiaranger, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent addition of a reference to the article about state atheism. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 00:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:United States#National March

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:United States#National March. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

United States' economy

_{<LINK REMOVED>} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs) 16:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spam is against the Wikipedia Talk Page Guidelines. Just an FYI: "While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia." Unless you have something meaningful to say (it appears not), do not say anything at all.--Sciophobiaranger (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a list of sources used by wikipedia and their correlating official estimates:

http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP_PPP.pdf
International Monetary Fund As you will see, you will see for majority of countries on this list - in 2013 they are reported as official statistics (unshaded) and in 2014 as unofficial staff estimates (shaded). This is because they have not released their official report for 2014.

Wikipedia usually uses either The World Bank or the IMF for their GDP statistics, and these are usually updated when the official report comes out. If you have an issue, take it up on the talk page instead of edit warring (again). Edits on Wikipedia are based on a consensus of editors, so stick to that guideline. --Sciophobiaranger (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The information for USA is an official estimate. For China it is a staff estimate, but it is with more than 190 billion dollars higher than the us. Firstly, it is implausible to occur such a big differences between estimate and reality, and secondly, the third source(which, obviously, remains the only left you would agree to be the truth) states that China has the biggest economy. - comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs)

The fact remains that there is no official statistic for China in 2014 and therefore the 2013 statistics will be used for rankings in this case. You can check the talk page of the article or the edit histories to see that this is the consensus came up at the end of March and still remains.Sciophobiaranger (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Economy of the United States

You've been warned per the result of WP:An3#User:Krull The Eternal reported by Sciophobiaranger (Result: Block, warning). While you both broke 3RR, the other party was much more stubborn and has been reverting since November 2014. Consider an WP:RFC or other steps of WP:Dispute resolution. Continuation of the war is likely to produce more blocks. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Viriditas. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to United States Department of Homeland Security seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

usa Economy

How I have been feeling during the last 2 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krull The Eternal (talk • contribs) 18:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should get over the grudge, it's been what, two months? -Sciophobiaranger (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sciophobiaranger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sciophobiaranger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Yemen airstrikes

On 12 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Yemen airstrikes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 08:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]