User talk:Scityscit

March 2021

Hello, I'm Anita5192. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Greatest common divisor have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Anita5192 (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scityscit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Scityscit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Scityscit! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

I recommend that you study our policies. Thanks. --Macrakis (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your warm welcome message. :) In my opinion this result is very interesting in a pure mathematical point of view. And I am a mathematician and verified the proof. What about adding a "Proof"-collapsed field under the statement?

What If I give a full proof in "proofwiki" and cite this?

Scityscit (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not that we doubt whether it is true. The problem is that there are many true results about GCDs, each interesting in its own way, and at some point we need to decide which to include and which not. The way we make that decision is to find enough reliable sources that talk about GCD and Pick's theorem together. I haven't been able to find any, let alone enough to show that this is a "standard" part of the discussion of GCD. --Macrakis (talk) 23:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay got it. So I try my luck in wikiproof.

Scityscit (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]