User talk:Segafan01

See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nintendoman01 for user's history and links to other blocked users

October 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Rupert Giles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Segafan01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am truly sorry for what I've been doing. I admit that what I did was wrong, and I promise never to do it again. Please, give me another chance.

Decline reason:

You are a sockpuppet of Nintendoman01, so really you only are on a one month block and once the block on that account expires you are welcome to once again edit. — Tiptoety ^talk 02:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

...edit as Nintendoman01. If you'd prefer to stay with this account, post another unblock here in a month and ask for Nintendoman01 to be blocked and this one unblocked. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]