User talk:Selim Shaikh

Nomination of Salim Reza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salim Reza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salim Reza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete page

Please Don't delete page salim reza page. Selim Shaikh (talk) 08:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to remove the deletion notice from your article. Please join the deletion discussion instead. Fram (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Salim Reza, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 11:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing the Salim Reza article (and more specifically the AfD notice on it). If you continue like this, you will be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 11:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Salim Reza. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Salim Reza. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dont remove page

Don't remove Salim Reza page. Please edit don't delete page. Selim Shaikh (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salim Raza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salim Raza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your disruption

Your incessant attempts to derail the deletion discussion, and now to ignore the outcome of it by creating a new article under a slightly different name, are getting very disruptive. If you want to avoid being blocked, stop making such edits. Fram (talk) 10:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salim Shaikh

Hello Selim Shaikh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Salim Shaikh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Triptothecottage (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Salim Shaikh. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —teb728 t c 05:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Salim Shaikh. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —teb728 t c 05:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocked

You have now been indefinitely blocked from editing. All you do here is creating articles on a non notable person, where you deliberately insert false information (about them being a scientist at first, about them being an MP in the most recent version). You have had ample warnings, but you continued with the same behaviour anyway. Fram (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Selim Shaikh, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Selim Shaikh, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]