User talk:Serpinium

Welcome!

Hello, Serpinium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Vindicator (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Sewers and Richard Cox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPA comment re Jon Mikl Thor article

re "broke down massive lead into subsections. The article is still biased junk though" that's not just a POV statement it's also a POV against JMT who's been listening to me about proper citing and so on; I haven't had time to work on it though the links given contain nearly all that's in the article; like a lot of celeb articles it's got content and format problems; he's respecting what I told him about COI, you should not be calling his contribuations "biased junk", but workign to either remove or reword what you see as biased and not degrade and insult another editor...and yes, he's another editor, and you're directly insulting him; it's also BLP too, if you stop and think about it. Disrespect is way too common in Wikipedia, as is pompous arrogance; if thine eye offend thee strike it out....and be polite to someone who has seen fit to abide by wikipedia rules and reespets guidance... you should too.Skookum1 (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a stretch to call out "degrading insult" (per the definitions in WP:PA), but I am sorry about that nasty edit summary. I never meant to insult Thor or any other editor; in fact I had no idea he was involved with the article.

I have made another edit since, improving the grammar, fixing mistakes, adding links and reformulating or removing material that presented bias. --Serpinium (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been slagged for alleged NPA for far less myself, if I were to post anything directly down-putting like that I know what I'd hear....even for simply discussing /recounting another editor's actions I've been accused of NPA; originally it was meant for direct insult and obscenities and such, but has become much more since....

I've been meaning to get back to that article; I read one of those mag-cites and nearly everything in the content, brag-sounding or otherwise, is in there. That's why I took refimprove off in fact.....Skookum1 (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is his talkpage.Skookum1 (talk) 10:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Mikl Thor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Only The Strong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TerrorVision, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy metal and Swingers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creature (1985 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aliens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Blood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Guard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixes

I noticed you've been doing some very nice edits, so here's:

	The Fossilized Barnstar
	For all your tidying up of various extinction-related articles! FunkMonk (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged. --Serpinium (talk) 09:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California condor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zooniverse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amerzone

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amerzone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amerzone

The article Amerzone you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Amerzone for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ocean sunfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bostonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amerzone

The article Amerzone you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Amerzone for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Invader (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Cook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Invader stealth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Invader stealth.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Invader (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI, Miniature and Nuking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't It Cool

The Ain't It Cool is not a reliable website as it is. Harry Knowles "is" the website and its is a movie gossip website. Los Angeles Times: "... a World Wide Web site (http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com) that dishes up gossip about Hollywood productions..." "Not every studio executive expresses concern about Knowles and other Web gossip brokers." Hollywood Reporter: "'Ain't It Cool News has always been a business that was run like a really great hobby,' says writer Drew McWeeny, one of Knowles' oldest friends and a former contributor (under the byline Moriarty) to the site. 'As a result, I don't believe it is the business it could have or even should have been. People came to him and offered venture capital. There were some fairly major overtures made. But Harry would not get in a position where someone else could say yes or no. It remains exactly what it was in 1996-97, which is Harry's personal site with Harry's friends and a few close collaborators. It's still a scrappy little bedroom operation. I suspect as long as Harry is part of Ain't It Cool News, that is what it will be.'"

The article you linked from AIC shows that he treats it as his personal website as the intro is total from a personal perspective not a journalistic one, which is a tip off that it is not a news site nor reliable. Spshu (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu: Doesn't it even count as a primary source for the VFX artist who wrote to him? What if I added "Harry claims..." to show it may not be reliable? Serpinium (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Spshu (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu: Done. Thanks! Serpinium (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rune (video game), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maces and Axes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buteogallus borrasi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aquila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Backfire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Serpinium. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Serpinium. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe in Santa

The article Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe in Santa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As another editor mentioned on talk page, article was deleted after an AfD early 2017; concerns raised then do not appear to have been resolved.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe in Santa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe in Santa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe in Santa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]