User talk:SexySeaClownfish

Archives

{{SUBST:User:Wikieditor222/Signiture}} 15:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC) SexySeaClownfish (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on RyRy5's Talk Page

No, you don't stink just because people don't want a new signature. It's just that people are happy with their sig the way it is. if you really like sig design, talk to Ryan Taylor. Shapiros10 WuzHere 20:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have "SexySeaClownfish's Talk Page" on top. If you want this to be your username, go to WP:USURP. Shapiros10 WuzHere 20:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Name Change

Hi I Have seen you have changed you Signature, User page, and Talk Page to Say "SexySeaClownFish" but you havent officy Changed you username at Wikipedia:Changing username thankyou, ElectricalExperiment 22:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Changed your signature without changing the username. ElectricalExperiment 23:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to User:Someone the Person. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 00:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who has put themselves up to be an admin ought to have the judgment to avoid such childish vandalism. There is no excuse for this sort of action by any editor, let alone one being considered as an admin. I strongly suggest you withdraw your request for administration since there is no chance that it will pass. Gwernol 00:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is another example of the sort of edit you should absolutely avoid if you wish to become an admin in the future. Gwernol 00:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent RfA

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have ~400 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! Koji †Dude ^(C) 00:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent Edits

Hello, I noticed that you made a premature RFA. If you would like, check into the Adoption program. I would also be avaliable to be your adopter. Let me know if your interested. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 00:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Artix Entertainment: Welcome!

Hello, and thanks for joining WikiProject Artix Entertainment, a collaborative effort that aims to organize the information in articles relating to Artix Entertainment, as well as expanding their coverage. Before you start editing and adding information to Artix Entertainment articles, you may wish to check to see if you have read and understood the article guidelines for video games, and WikiProject Artix Entertainment's helpful guides. You may also wish to see our Current Tasks. Also, if you so choose, you can add the WikiProject Artix Entertainment userbox to your userpage by adding {{User WikiProject Artix Entertainment}}. If you have any additional questions about the project, you can post them on our talk page.

Ronan Alifar (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: adopt

Sure, why not? If you have any queries, don't hesitate to ask. The Chronic 04:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

I apologize if I upset you. I just wanted to minimize confusion. Shapiros10 WuzHere 20:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 21:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Substitution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Please subst welcome messages, using {{subst:welcome}} instead of {{welcome}} . Also, wait that a user has edited before welcoming, we agreed that massing welcome messages was not a good idea. Cenarium (talk) 23:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you forgot to substitute your welcome message, you just have to replace {{{welcome}} with {{subst:welcome}}, this way you'll avoid a lot of work to our bots and editors who have to fix this. Cenarium (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

I've noticed that most of your contributions seem to be asking others if they want a new signature. Just a friendly reminder to try to edit in the article namespace more. Shapiros10 WuzHere 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per request, I will tell you what I've told a couple of other people. Signatures and userpages are fun, but at the same time Wikipedia is not a Myspace. If a user is only interested in having fun, and not interested in improving the mainspace, then we have to crack down and prevent the user from using the site for something that it wasn't intended for. Everyone likes to have fun; as you can see both Shapiros10 and I have custom signatures and fancy userpages. However, Wikipedia serves a higher purpose, and we have to serve this higher purpose as well if we want to have fun with the website. The best way to help Wikipedia is to improve the article namespace. This is the most important part of Wikipedia. Please shift a higher level of focus to this namespace, be it through copyediting, vandal patrolling, sourcing, anything that fits with your abilities. I'm sure that Shapiros and I would be more than happy to assist you with finding your personal niche. We want you to have as much fun as we have, if not more, but at the same time Wikipedia demands something more from you in exchange for the incredible community experience this website has to offer. Cheers :) The Hybrid 03:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statustop template: alternate updating method

SoxBot V has been taken offline indefinitely, therefore {{Statustop}} now uses a semi-manual updating method taking the status from Special:Mypage/Status. You can use the Qui monobook script written by TheDJ to update this page at the click of a button.

Certain parameters are no longer used, so you may wish to check the documentation of the Statustop template to ensure you are using it properly. Please feel free to drop by my talk page with any questions or concerns or to report problems with the template. Happy editing, xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 14:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SoxBot V is indef blocked, changing that page to "enable" won't fix it. Read the above, for a workaround. xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 00:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

help request

Sure, what's up? xenocidic (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to accomplish but if you want to add your own custom statuses you'll need two pages - one to hold statuses and one to hold the switch. User:Wikieditor222/StatusTemplate now holds the template and User:Wikieditor222/Status now holds the switch. Your custom status "stupid" should work properly now - though I don't know why you'd want to say that! Let me know if you need further assistance. xenocidic (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar and signature. Unfortunately, the sig is too long. You did inspire me to create my own sig, though. Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Created Signatures

As much as I appreciate the signature you made me and the signatures you've created for others, be aware that you may be blocked for focusing on giggies too much. That's what almost happened to me. I don't mean to insult you, I just wanted to let you know.

SAVIOR_SELF.777 04:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, you need to stop making these signatures and edit in the namespace. If you continue making signatures, only, I will get an admin involved, and it might lead to a block. iMatthew _T.C. 10:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Burns

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia , as you did to Bob Burns (drummer), you will be blocked from editing. Tagging an existing article with adequate details constitutes as vandalism. Please learn the ropes or face the consequences. Thankyou ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 10:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Jeff Hardy Tag Team Champ.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jeff Hardy Tag Team Champ.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. iMatthew _T.C. 01:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC) --iMatthew _T.C. 01:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk at WP:AN

Hi, just a courtesy note to say that a discussion involving you has been started on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Wikieditor222. Kevin (talk) 01:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In essence, I think you need to read and take on board some of the criticism above, and even if you do not agree, leave an answer here or at WP:AN so that people can see that you are reading their messages. Cheers Kevin (talk) 01:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

Your SUL is deleted now--Nick1915 (talk) 10:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

I take it you are part of the WP:PW crew Sexy Sea Bassist 00:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: hey

Thanks a lot for the barnstar, it's good to know that someone noticed. 75pickup (talk · contribs)

Heads up

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Special:Contributions/SexySeaClownfish. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 04:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I have deleted every item in your userspace. Wikipedia is not a community website. If you contribute more to articles, then maybe you can spend time on your user space.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd REALLY hate to say this, bro, but, you had it coming. I mean 19 mainspace edits only? Come on, dude! If you need any help, let me know. By the way, I don't know how long you've been here, but you may want to consider getting adopted. If not, that's fine. Just remember, mainspace edits should come before userspace edits. I know what you're thinking right now, I'm doing the same thing. There's just two differences.

I've made more than 19 mainspace edits, I think
Someone's using my username that's not me and ruining my contributions

Just remember that mainspace is always over userspace. I'll do whatever I can to help. Damn, I hope this doesn't ruin our friendship here on WP or on YouTube. SAVIOR_SELF.777 06:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

From the above it seems apparent you are having problems using Wikipedia and I'd like to offer to help. If you don't feel confident in writing articles don't feel that you have nothing to offer. Whilst I'm not a great article writer I think I've done some good work here and more than half of my edits are in the main space. Simple things like correcting grammar or spelling or adding references and maintenance tags have a positive effect on the encyclopaedia and are valued contributions. As has been repeated above several times Wikipedia is not a social networking site but that doesn't mean it is not a community, if you think you might be interested in editing in any particular area and need some advice I would be happy to help or look here for other editors who would be willing to take you under your wing on a more formal basis. Try not to take anything that has happened personally, it is not intended in such a way and if you do decide to try and help develop the encyclopaedia your contribution will be valued. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:SexySeaClownfish

A tag has been placed on User:SexySeaClownfish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:SexySeaClownfish|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. iMatthew _T.C. 15:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT?!?!?!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SexySeaClownfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked and who is this I'm On Base guy?

Decline reason:

Since you have retired (in the process attacking another editor) and you have been using IPs to continue to vandalize your own user page, there is no reason to unblock you. In addition, the relationship betwen you and I'm On Base is clear. Gwernol 21:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SexySeaClownfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was usingthe ips to fix my userpage and you randomly accuse me of being a sockpuppet? This place is weird.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:I'm On Base. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.