User talk:Sfsheath

Welcome!

Hello, Sfsheath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! _{Hydrogen Iodide} _(HI!) 17:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern sigillata d

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eastern sigillata d, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://everything2.com/node/superdoc/Findings%253A.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello Sfsheath, please take a look at eastern sigillata A, etc. I've added a source and changed capitalization. -- Kubanczyk (talk) 09:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization seems right. I had meant to get around to that change myself, so thanks for doing! Sfsheath (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

African red slip

If you want to move it you should go through WP:RM, but I would oppose it. The term with "ware" is apparently predominant, used by the British Museum etc and preferable as a title in a general encyclopedia, as more explanatory. No doubt specialists omit it, but are readers are not specialists. We have Black-burnished ware & Huntcliff ware, so there is nothing unusual in having this. Johnbod (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You'll win on the basis of being in the top 400. But " ware" is less common in the literature, not used for the other Mediterranean wide Roman ceramic categories (Terra Sigiallta, ESA, ESB, ESC, ESD, Phocaean Red Slip). " ware" looks to be added for more regional categories. The change was unnecessary given how the unappended title had been around. Oh, well.

November 2014

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Amphitheater at Lixus with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amphitheater at Lixus with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was information for the amphitheater at Carnuntum that was there by clear mistake. It wil take a little while to get the page into shape so the comment will come when it's at all readable.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sfsheath. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sfsheath. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hadrianic building projects

Category:Hadrianic building projects and others may be renamed or deleted. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 16#Category:Buildings and structures by monarch. – Fayenatic London 08:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]