User talk:Sharayugawai

Welcome!

Hello Sharayugawai! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

February 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sadia Khateeb has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sadia Khateeb was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/sadiakhateeb?s=21) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadguru Brahmeshanand Acharya Swami moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sadguru Brahmeshanand Acharya Swami, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goldmedal Electricals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goldmedal Electricals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmedal Electricals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 07:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello Sharayugawai. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Goldmedal Electricals, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sharayugawai. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sharayugawai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 18:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Goldmedal Electricals, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sharayugawai, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sharayugawai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 09:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goldmedal Electricals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goldmedal Electricals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmedal Electricals (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand why do you want this article to be deleted so badly? You nominated this one again after soft delete and it came back on request. You are not even letting say keep or comment you are deleting my comments I dont know whats wrong with this brand. Sharayugawai (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong is there is no coverage that is not press-release and PR from the company itself. Per WP:SIRS, not a single reference is valid. You cant put up any old junk for references and expect it to accepted. The WP:NCORP policy covers business article and its very specific on what is allowed and what is not allowed. scope_creep^Talk 16:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. scope_creep^Talk 13:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to undisclosed paid editor

Hi, I’m not being paid for this article, I dont even know who pays for brand wiki articles! There are too many hoardings in mumbai, India about this brand so I was just googling about the brand! Since I joint wikipedia almost a year ago, thought of giving a try creating this one. Sharayugawai (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sharayugawai: Do you know people in the company? The article is a brochure article for a private company. It has no right to be on Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 15:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know, I’m student of arts and trying to learn about internet skills, I put all the information in article from internet there’s no single information I’ve gotten out of internet. You can check maybe the articles are press released but not sure since they are not tagged as press releases Sharayugawai (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prateik Chaudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prateik Chaudhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateik Chaudhary. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:37, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I just checked the Deletion discussion for previously deleted version, He had two shows and one was not notable but for now there's another one and which is quiet notable also has page on wiki for his two nation tv shows Sharayugawai (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58 Hi, I was able to find the deletion log for this article, and it was previously deleted over a year ago, and I also looked at Article for deletion page for this article and it has one comment saying this can be created if there's one notable show for this actor. consider this and let me know what needs to be fixed so I can keep adding notable people to wikipedia without getting them deleted. Sharayugawai (talk) 10:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

I've disabled this account until you make the proper disclosures per WP:PAID. You've re-used clearly falsified SEO/black hat sources even after they were pointed out to you to promote your articles. Given the numerous warnings about this above, I simply do not believe that you're not making paid or COI edits. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get paid for Cloe’s article but I know her she asked me if you can publish so I did its okay if its not fitting the criteria but why block what else I need to do for unblocking the account? Sharayugawai (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe you. You'll need to make disclosures for the relationships to the promotional articles you've created. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Its okay if the article does not fit the criteria on wikipedia, but blocking my account I would not be able create more articles or edit any more, you delete this article or move it draft again I wont re-publish it but atleast umblock it I really enjoy being on Wikipedia its really different than any other platform, I will no more write or publish Conflict of interest related article unless they comply with proper guidelines. This was first & last mistake. Sharayugawai (talk) 18:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not your first mistake. You should not be making any further edits until you follow our terms of use. You should not be making articles until you have a basic grasp of sourcing and some ethical sense. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Okay, but will I be getting unblocked? I’ll not directly or indirectly create articles unless they are within terms of use & properly sourced. Sharayugawai (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kapilakshi Malhotra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kapilakshi Malhotra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapilakshi Malhotra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

US-Verified (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]