Jump to content

User talk:Shine Nelson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of Summaries section on Top Singer (TV series)

[edit]

Hi!.Myself Midhun. I have noticed that you had edited the summaries section which I have created. But I think so it doesn't merely mention the name of the participants but their ranks they have received during each stage...... As you said, in the Participants section their marks are specified but not their ranks. We are not able to provide the marks as the judges have not specified the marks but they have said the contestants ranks in an episode. And I think the section is a well organised elimination chart...

So I am re-adding the section... Also, I humbly request to add the information of the further stages if you get it.....


Thank you

Hey @Midhun 2: thanks for reaching out. I did start a discussion on this specific topic on the article's talk page itself. I'm not sure whether you saw that discussion. I also did mention you there as well. I think this topic is best discussed on the article's talk page, rather than on a user's talk page ( like mine, here ). Please continue this discussion on the article's talk page.
To address your specific point about marks and ranks - yes, the judges do mention each of the participants' marks after each stage. I did not just randomly put up random numbers on the table. Didn't you also notice that I have added citations to each marks that I've added? They point to specific YouTube clips where the marks have been announced. Except for the latest episodes, I've added references for each and every mark that I've come across. I'll continue to update that list as and when I come across more information. The judges might not have mentioned every single participants' marks, but at least I've tried to add the marks of people I have come across ( which is a majority, by the way ).
As to ranks, the Top Singer (TV series)#Contestants table is a 'sortable' table which can be sorted to find the rankings per stage ( which is pretty much what your table also does ). Like I have mentioned in my message on the article's talk page, that just makes the content redundant, in my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion, but I think we could discuss this with the larger Wikipedia community on the article's talk page. ~ shine | talk 20:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]