User talk:Shine Nelson
Appearance
Removal of Summaries section on Top Singer (TV series)
[edit]Hi!.Myself Midhun. I have noticed that you had edited the summaries section which I have created. But I think so it doesn't merely mention the name of the participants but their ranks they have received during each stage...... As you said, in the Participants section their marks are specified but not their ranks. We are not able to provide the marks as the judges have not specified the marks but they have said the contestants ranks in an episode. And I think the section is a well organised elimination chart...
So I am re-adding the section... Also, I humbly request to add the information of the further stages if you get it.....
Thank you
- Hey @Midhun 2: thanks for reaching out. I did start a discussion on this specific topic on the article's talk page itself. I'm not sure whether you saw that discussion. I also did mention you there as well. I think this topic is best discussed on the article's talk page, rather than on a user's talk page ( like mine, here ). Please continue this discussion on the article's talk page.
- To address your specific point about marks and ranks - yes, the judges do mention each of the participants' marks after each stage. I did not just randomly put up random numbers on the table. Didn't you also notice that I have added citations to each marks that I've added? They point to specific YouTube clips where the marks have been announced. Except for the latest episodes, I've added references for each and every mark that I've come across. I'll continue to update that list as and when I come across more information. The judges might not have mentioned every single participants' marks, but at least I've tried to add the marks of people I have come across ( which is a majority, by the way ).
- As to ranks, the Top Singer (TV series)#Contestants table is a 'sortable' table which can be sorted to find the rankings per stage ( which is pretty much what your table also does ). Like I have mentioned in my message on the article's talk page, that just makes the content redundant, in my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion, but I think we could discuss this with the larger Wikipedia community on the article's talk page. ~ shine | talk 20:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)