User talk:Sibtain 007

Welcome!

Hello, Sibtain 007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shah Zaib, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! QU ^TalkQu 17:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shah Zaib

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shah Zaib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. QU ^TalkQu 17:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Shah Zaib

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shah Zaib, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.samaa.tv/newsdetail.aspx?ID=43830&CID=1. As a copyright violation, Shah Zaib appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shah Zaib has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shah Zaib and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Shah Zaib with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shah Zaib.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tonywalton ^Talk 20:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For such a great appreciation.

Sibtain 007 (talk) 10:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meera

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Meera (Irtiza Rubab), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali.zafar.portrait.jpg

Hello. I noticed you uploaded the file File:Ali.zafar.portrait.jpg. In doing so, on the WP:File Upload Wizard page, you clicked on an option that said "I took it from a website or other published source, where its author has explicitly placed it under a free license, allowing free re-use by anybody." Below that you must have seen a big red warning box stating: "The website must explicitly say that the image is released under a license that allows free re-use for any purpose [...] You must be able to point exactly to where it says this. If the source website doesn't say so explicitly, please do not upload the file." Further below on the same page, there was a text box labelled "Provide a link to where the author explicitly says that the file is released under a free license." In this box, you entered a link to this webpage.

You also entered "Google" as the "Author/owner" of this image.

Please don't take this as criticism, but I'd really be interested in hearing from you why you thought you could upload this file in this way. You are not the only person to make mistakes like this, and I am trying to improve our upload forms to make them easier to understand, in order to avoid misunderstandings like this. I'd really like to understand if there was anything unclear about the explanations I quoted above? Could you explain why, after these explanations, you thought that an image you found on Google was in the public domain?

Thank you, Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "True Torah Jews."

A page you created, True Torah Jews., has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 20:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music Blvd

Hi Sibtain 007! I noticed you've been adding links to musicblvd.com to Bon Jovi song articles, and adding a link to MusicBlvd. It appears that Wikipedia's article on MusicBlvd is about an unrelated defunct web site, and http://actionfactory.com/contact/ shows they call the website "Music Blvd" (although that's not obvious from their logo). I made a change to Bad Medicine (song) that you might want to make on the other pages. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 00:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sibtain 007, some of the pages you've been adding lyrics sites to already have a lyrics site present. On Come On Over Baby (All I Want Is You), for example, there was already one there. There isn't any need for two. Thanks. Acalamari 13:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stop adding these links? I don't see them as encyclopedic and I think you should seek wider consensus before adding them. You should certainly not mark such as additions as "minor" either. I am reverting your edits until I see evidence of a consensus to include them. --John (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting my lyrics links editings on different songs pages because the previous lyrics link which is of metrolyrics which is not accessible (banned) in Pakistan and many other Middle Eastern countries. kindly undo your revertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibtain 007 (talk • contribs)

As I said, you need to get a consensus to add these, and you need top stop marking them as minor. --John (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you help me for this consensus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibtain 007 (talk • contribs)

Certainly. I suggest you post (at the bottom) on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Please explain why you want to add these and how it will help our users and our project. Good luck. --John (talk) 16:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advice. I have posted it kindly review my post. John if you have reviewed my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs so please undo the revertions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibtain 007 (talk • contribs)

No, we now need to see if people think it is a good idea. See WP:CONSENSUS. --John (talk) 18:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Its Ok I will wait for what people think and I will respect there decision . Sibtain 007 (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page HTML, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music Blvd lyrics Links

Hi there, you say you can't access Metrolyrics in Pakistan. Is there anyway I can see and confirm this independently? Just curious. BTW Your National Anthem is at Metrolyrics. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I appreciate your curiosity and I can show it to you by screen sharing via skype.

Sibtain 007 (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zikkiu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zikkiu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 15:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, Sibtain 007. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Zikkiu, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zikkiu, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Panther Tyres

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panther Tyres, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sibtain 007. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Joe Linus, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bazinga! Technologies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bazinga! Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Laura Sullivan (disambiguation) was accepted

Laura Sullivan (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sibtain 007. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 15:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DES ^(talk) 15:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	keep it up Kiran567 (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	nice work Kiran567 (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sibtain 007. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some files that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sibtain 007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Largo Plazo (talk) 19:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sibtain_007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sibtain 007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]