User talk:Sida 66-gaa

Speedy deletion nomination of MoTA

Hello Sida 66-gaa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MoTA for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nicky mathew (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sida 66-gaa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sida 66-gaa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Please do not add redlinks to templates. In addition, you are adding content that does not even have to do with Electronic Music. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 19:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the red link, philipslab was an electronic studio ran by Dick Raaijmakers. Please do some research on the subject, before considering it vandaslim. Sida 66-gaa (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article you linked to contained no relevant information on Electronic Music, so I apologize. Cheers. I do think it may be a good idea to discuss the changes on the templates talk page first though. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 19:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strange the article doesn't mention anything on the sound division of the lab. The article about Dick Raaijmakers does though, and his role and that of the Philipslab in the history of electronic music is known among people who also know about the Cologne studio and the BBC studio. The edits I did are now done, no further adjustment needed. Best wishes, Sida 66-gaa (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Museum of Transitory Art (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please consider adding inline citations and review WP:REFB. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or asking at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Museum of Transitory Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Museum of Transitory Art, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 19:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Museum of Transitory Art

Hello, Sida 66-gaa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Museum of Transitory Art".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]