User talk:Silvery
DYK for Gotham Book Mart
[edit]
|
On 4 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gotham Book Mart, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 04:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Circle squaring
[edit]I like the material you added to Squaring the circle, but I have two comments. First, it begins noting that Dodgson "also" was interested in debunking circle-squarers, but this seems to be dangling. Are you refering to other interests of Dodgson, or to other people who expressed such interest? In the first case, this is irrelevant to that page, in the second, none are mentioned as of yet. Second: I am skeptical of its placement in the "History" section. The section discusses the problems and attempts at solutions, and ended with a mention of the proof of impossibility; the material on debunking seems out of place there. I'm not sure where to put it, mind you. Perhaps a new section or a subsection within History, adding something about De Morgan and/or others... Magidin (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm guilty of not making this as clear as it should have been! I should have written that he "also" apparently had some sort of logical proof of impossibility, and as evidence of that, he wanted to publish a tract to explain it to people who were convinced otherwise. Perhaps it could be stated that many subsequent mathematicians knew that squaring the circle could not be possible due to the nature of Pi, and for example, Charles L. Dodgson lamented being unable to convince amateur mathematicians of its invincibility.
- The problem is not unlike that of the notion of a perpetual motion machine: no matter how you try to explain to people that perpetual motion cannot occur due to the law of conservation of energy (to say the least), there are some who insist that it could be accomplished.
- I think it does belong in the History section, if the history is to provide historical overview of the concept. Dodgson was notable, and I think his mentions and interest in Squaring the Circle are also worthy of mention. However, if the history was intended to only cover notable solutions/debunkings, then you're right and the mention of Dodgson should be shifted elsewhere. Perhaps to a new section for mentions of Squaring the Circle in popular culture?
- Silver (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Silvery. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Silvery. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Bizrate Insights logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bizrate Insights logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bush's Best Brand Logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bush's Best Brand Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
