User talk:Simon.rashleigh

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Simon.rashleigh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jamietw (talk) 05:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hi there, please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! Oz ^talk 00:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Records

At one point you had edited CBS Records, please join us at Talk:CBS Records to help decide what that page should entail. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me Richard, I would be delighted to join this discussion. Regards Simon Rashleigh 07:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you revert the article from CBS Records (2006) to "CBS Records" so we can restore the edit history and be back to where we were for the consensus on the talk page. We now have 1,300 incoming links to a disambiguation page. We should have multiple articles but the landing page for the 1,300 links should be the proper business entity "CBS Records". None of the links are for CBS Records (2006). He was not supposed to cut and paste without also moving the edit history. Once the article is back we can begin to distinguish between CBS Records and CBS Records International. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to let the dust settle first Richard, as its all happening too quick with edits and counter edits. Let's see what happens over the next 48 hours to see if this is fixed by the author of those changes you mentioned. Cheers Simon Simon Rashleigh 02:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

The American Columbia/Philips association began in 1951 as shown at [1] when Philips started its record company and made the deal with American Columbia which ended its decades long deal with EMI over EMI's resistence to issuing LPs which Columbia developed. EMI relented and began issuing LPs in 1952 as shown at [2]. As shown at [3], Philips' acquisition of Mercury Records paved the way for Columbia to start its own international arm which had to be called CBS Records. Philips began marketing CBS label recordings in 1962 as shown at [4]. The association with Philips ended in 1965 after CBS bought Oriole Records as shown at [5]. Steelbeard1 (talk) 03:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CBS consensus debate reopened

Can you express an opinion one way or the other at Talk:CBS Records. There are now two new choices based on the articles as they stand now. We can't go back to whatever the original consensus was, since changes have been made that obviate the original choices. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing happens to the CBS Records International page. It remains part of the CBS Records DAB page. Steelbeard1 (talk) 11:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "CBS Records". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 12 September 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning CBS Records, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 11:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

29th Melbourne Meetup

Hello, you have previously indicated that you would be interested in attending Melbourne meetups. A meetup will be held on Wednesday August 12, 2015 6-8pm. Please check out Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 29 for details and add your name to the list if you think you can attend. --Michael Billington (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Simon.rashleigh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Wikimeetup (June/July)

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch)
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi, I've just made a doodle poll to vote on the best date for the next Wikimeetup in Melbourne (Beer Deluxe, Fed Square). Would be great to see you there. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 12:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of next Melbourne meetup decided:

When: 6-8pm, Sunday 8 July 2018
Where: Beer DeLuxe, Flinders St

T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 01:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]