Please put messages below the message line and put in a numerical order. Thank you(Simplewikipedian (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)) [reply]

Messages

(Numbered list item)

Nomination of SurveySparrow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SurveySparrow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SurveySparrow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 08:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yaagneshwaran Ganesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yaagneshwaran Ganesh, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaagneshwaran Ganesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The ABM Conversations Podcast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The ABM Conversations Podcast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Simplewikipedian. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The ABM Conversations Podcast, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The ABM Conversations Podcast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The ABM Conversations Podcast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arnab Piush Biswas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arnab Piush Biswas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simplewikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like request a Unblock request and grab attention of admins. I was recently blocked after an SPI and the discussion can be found here. There the blocking admin assumed that I am a duck and might have affilation to the following account Arnab Piush Biswas. I would like to pointout some points, so that it is easier for you to understand the situation and take actions accordingly. *It is understood that my Upwork account has the same name as the previously mentioned account and the blocking admin misunderstood the situation. But with good faith, I have been using "SimpleWikipedian" only. And have no affilation to anyother accounts on Wikipedia. *I have no affilation to the previously mentioned account. And I have not violated any of the blocking policy and there are no sleeper accounts of me, that the blcoking admin assumed. *I have been doing paid works and has always declared the COI and always abide by the rules. *No violations can be found against Simplewikipedian. And Ducky things can be found to get blocked. So my request is to Unblock me because there is no proof of any sockpuppetry, blocking policy violations, WP:Duck or any sleeper accounts violation; so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia with good and crystal clear faith. Simplewikipedian (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is five months old. On the Upwork account linked to from your user page, I see paid Wikipedia jobs going back to 2020. I cannot square these two facts: either you are being dishonest about never having had another Wikipedia account, or you are being dishonest about your experience on your Upwork page - this does not give me any confidence that I can unblock you. Anyway, under this account, you have been creating unacceptably promotional articles for your clients, in article space rather than in draft space, which wastes our volunteers' time and is sufficient to warrant a block in itself even if there weren't concerns about your honesty. Girth Summit _(blether) 05:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaagneshwaran Ganesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yaagneshwaran Ganesh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]