User talk:Sinlu22

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinlu22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because I didn't build an encyclopedia. I didn't vandalize anything. Can you please block The Anchronist and unblock my user page?

Decline reason:

For one thing, never include as part of an unblock request a request that any other user be blocked. It doesn't work that way. It especially does not work that way when the user you request a block of is the blocking administrator.

For another ... you say you "didn't vandalize anything"? Well what the hell's this then? On another user's page, yet? And restored after two previous reverts?

You are right about one thing, though ... you sure weren't building an encyclopedia. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2018

Hello, I'm Trooper1005. Your recent edit to the page The_Quad_(TV_series) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -=Troop=- (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tyler Perry's New Now

Hello, Sinlu22,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Path slopu, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Tyler Perry's New Now for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 06:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tyler Perry's New Now

Hello, Sinlu22,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Tyler Perry's New Now, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please do not use the edit summary "fixed typo" when you are not correcting a spelling error. ... discospinster _talk 20:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Citrivescence. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Twenties (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Your addition of the word "transgendered" is uncited and is interpreted as disruptive. Citrivescence (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twenties (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from adding uncited information to this article. The character is not trans. Citrivescence (talk) 00:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twenties (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. This is your third notification. Citrivescence (talk) 01:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twenties (TV series). Citrivescence (talk) 02:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shutup Sinlu22 (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 35629

UTRS appeal #35629 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #59714

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]