User talk:Skyfall

This user has been on Wikipedia for 17 years, 11 months and 16 days.

Please, use the main talk page (I check it more frequently):

English and Italian are preferred, otherwise Spanish or French. --Skyfall (talk) 07:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diachrony

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Diachrony, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Synchrony and diachrony. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, It was an intentional editing on order to resolve the ambiguity in Wikidata about "Synchrony" and "Synchronic". Please, note there was the page for "Synchronic" and one for "Synchrony", one for "Diachronic" but not for "Diachrony". A few Wikis' like the English one have a common page for both ("Synchrony and diachrony"), sometimes in common with the redirect to "Dicotomias saussureanas". Creating the page "Diachrony" I've been able to substitute "Diachronic" with "Diachrony" in Wikidata. --Skyfall (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Munsö, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jarl, Refil and Viken. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Hello, I agree on your recent edit on Kosovo but I have little hope that this modification will resist. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fra gli utenti che regolarmente editano su quella pagina, ce ne sono alcuni con i quali è veramente difficile ragionare. Vedrai... --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Skyfall. You have new messages at Oranges Juicy's talk page.
Message added 16:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Response now provided!

OJ (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, concerning BER, the main issue is that there was an opening attempt that failed. That was in 2012. Now, a report was released, that had 1 main topic: the disastrous lapses that led to the failure in opening. So the opening is from 2012 and the report is from 2016.

The interrupted construction process is independent of this. Its neither related to the failed opening in 12 nor the report from 16. It happened in 15 when TUV checked ventilators which hung from the roof. The roof was incapable of carrying 4t ventilators each. Thus TUV forbade any further work in the main hall for 1 month in sep 15 because workers were in danger of being struck by falling 4t fans.

So the line "All trials halted" relates to the issue from sep 15. They resumed meanwhile. I deleted the line then. Thank you for your vigilance. --Ccokz (talk) 19:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Skyfall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and RfC

Hi Skyfall, I noticed that you were reverted once again by the same IP hopper on the Abkhazia page.[1] The IP refers to the "RfC" that was made and closed some time ago, but as far as I can see, no consensus was reached to change it? Or am I missing something? Bests (oh, and a happy new year!) - LouisAragon (talk)|

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montegridolfo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISTAT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Skyfall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Skyfall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peder Vilhelm Jensen-Klint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holsteinborg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on BRUA pipeline

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page BRUA pipeline, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aghlabids. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 00:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of Tunisia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 00:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ms.Bittcoin is engaged in an edit war with everyone, in order to put everywhere this [debated map. See history on Commons and other pages on Wikipedia.--Skyfall (talk) 00:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't post personal attacks against editors. And don't post them on someone else's talk page, as you did on mine ([2]). M.Bitton reverted your bold edits, per WP:BRD, and it's quite clear that you then chose to start two edit-wars over something you personally disagree with. R Prazeres (talk) 00:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But pay attention in the Discussion page an in the History of Aghlabids_Dynasty Debated map. --Skyfall (talk) 00:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it all. Pay attention to the original talk page discussion and consensus on this at Talk:Aghlabids#Inclusion of Sardinia to the map, which has been repeatedly pointed out. In short: the map is directly based on a WP:RS, multiple other RS show the same thing, and there's a footnote specifically in the caption to direct readers to further details and debate. R Prazeres (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]