User talk:Sllee19

About Zheng He

Please stop deleting the paragraph about Geoff Wade in this article. If you believe the paragraph has no place in the article, kindly state your reasons on the article's talk page. If they are convincing, then your suggested change will be supported. It is discourteous to continue to delete the paragraph as if hoping that no one will notice. -- Rob C (Alarob) 22:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Zheng He - June 24, 2007 Edit

If you're going to delete this paragraph, please tell everyone why. Otherwise, people will keep putting it back. Is there something wrong with the source that was cited? Is what's in the article not matching the source? Do you simply disagree with the paragraph (in which case you should be building a pro and con argument section, not just chopping out other people's work). --KNHaw ^(talk) 15:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Dr. Lee, I believe that your repeated deletion of a paragraph from Zheng He, while refusing to discuss the matter, amounts to disruptive editing. Please be more courteous toward the rest of us. -- Rob C (Alarob) 21:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Wade is unqualified

Geoff Wade has exposed his poor judgment and disqualified himself to be a Ming history expert by his ignorance that brass was a new technology evolved around Xuan De era. You can search the web for his comments. His continued disruption of open discussion on Zheng He's role in world navigation by sabotaging lectures that are different from his view is unprofessional and unacademic. I have collected more than 10 independent evidence that can prove Zheng He's fleet reaching America. However, my posts to this section have been repeatedly deleted. Other than translating Ming Shi Lu (which is a team work rather than his own), Geoff Wade knows little about Ming history, and much less about Chinese history. Check: http://www.asiawind.com/forums/read.php?f=10&i=47&t=47.Sllee19 12:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. I hope you will reply once again to clarify your statement. You seem to be saying that Geoff Wade is unqualified to comment on Zheng He because:

He does not know when brass was developed. (How does this relate to his critique of the map?)
He has behaved badly at lectures. (How does his bad behavior relate to the substance of his critique?)

In the meantime, please refrain from deleting the paragraph, for the reasons stated above. -- Rob C (Alarob) 13:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing concerns

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 17:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zheng He -- sandbox

Please find my apology on the article's Talk page. Please advise whether you wish to initiate sanction proceedings, in which I will assist as I can. Respectfully, HenriLobineau 10:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gentlemen, if you wish to sanction me, I suggest you begin by each communicating with me on my talk page, User talk:Alarob, to show that you have made an effort to resolve the dispute. These guidelines should be helpful: WP:RFC#Request_comment_on_users. You have my full encouragement to proceed. -- Rob C (Alarob) 14:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]