User talk:Snake0124

Welcome!

Hello, Snake0124, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Independence Day (1996 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alien and Implode

Swordfish (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clandestine

The Erlenmeyer Flask (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clandestine

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mortal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Erlenmeyer Flask, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clandestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Die Another Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icelandic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Has Fallen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Marshals (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Peacemaker (1997 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your recent editing history at Iron Man (2008 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to GoldenEye‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Particulary, please review WP:FILMPLOT. DonQuixote (talk) 07:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GoldenEye. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Particularly, plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words.. DonQuixote (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at GoldenEye, you may be blocked from editing. Specifically, please keep track of the word count when editing the plot summary. Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words. DonQuixote (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 01:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Your edits have repeatedly been deleted as WP:PLOTBLOAT, please do not do this again - Arjayay (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomorrow Never Dies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Combat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Foreign and Domestic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scream 4. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits have repeatedly been deleted as WP:PLOTBLOAT and have been warned previously numerous times of your disruptive editing. Please do not do this again.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.40.18.61 (talk) 06:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shooter (2007 film); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barely Lethal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 08:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop interfering with other people's edits, editing and threatening to cancel other people's editing privileges when you've obviously never carried any power, authority or knowledge, to do so, is very annoying. I'm telling this to Binksternet and User:Wallyfromdilbert

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal. You are inserting information that is contradicted by the cited sources such as Metacritic. You need to stop. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Jackal (1997 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla

Please stop interfering with other people's edits. And by the way, erasing other people's edits and threatening to cancel other people's editing privileges when you've obviously never carried any power, authority or knowledge, to do so, is very annoying.

Stop restoring these edits (1, 2, 3, 4). You are repeatedly adding content that is never referenced or specified in the film. This is disruptive. If you continue to restore these edits, you will be blocked. Armegon (talk) 03:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Armegon (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Jackal (1997 film), you may be blocked from editing. You are inserting unsourced content and are not even using edit summaries for any of your edits. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Siege, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Annabeth Gish, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you removing the article's lead picture? You are still not using any edit summaries to explain your changes. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Annabeth Gish. Please stop removing the lead image of the article with no explanation. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please refrain from restoring "British Army former Colonel" in the plot summary. It is poor grammar and does not belong. If you have an issue, take it to the article's talk page. Armegon (talk) 06:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Monica Witt does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Marks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EOD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been told that IMDB is not an acceptable source. It seems from your editing history that you take no notice of warnings, so the next time you disrupt The Wraith or any other article on Wikipedia, your editing privileges will be blocked without further notice. Sweetpool50 (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already spoken about this issue to one of your administrators and the administrator in question agrees to everything that they're watching me do regardless of any disagreements between me & other Wikipedia members. So unless your complainant is an administrator on Wikipedia, no other member is equipped with any power or authority to discipline or punish me. Snake0124 (talk) 13:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]